Unthinkable: Is rewiring the brain the answer to ethics?

26 April 2015


From the Irish Times - Using Neurotechnologies to manipulate Cognitive Functions in order to COERCE through Bio-Technologies a person or person's to become more ETHICAL.  

What this article begins to outline is with the advances in Cognitive Neuroscience, and Nanoscience to include the gizmos, gadgets at their disposal to manipulate Cognitive, Motor, Central Nervous System, and or Behavioral Outcomes, better known as Neurotechnologies - can YOU MAKE SOMEONE MORE ETHICAL?  and SHOULD YOU?

LAYMAN'S EXAMPLE OF WHAT NEUROTECHNOLOGIES CAN DO - By sending a Magnetic Pulse through the human skull, targeted at specific regions of the Brain, which are known to control various biological functions, and how it can be interfered with.  

Michael Mosley has areas of his brain turned off - The Brain: A Secret History - BBC Four

Now these Professionals' are looking at how these advances may one day be USED to MAP, TRACK, and ZAP YOU AS AN AUTONOMOUS, FREE THINKING, SELF DETERMINED HUMAN BEING - Into COLLECTIVE COMPLIANCE - ultimately Automated Compliance.

The Very Question of WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE HUMAN being Relegated to an Autonomous Super Computer Programed to Determine what that is, as opposed to being a Unique, Individual with Freedom of Thought or Thoughts be they good, bad, wonderful, indifferent, or horrible - THEY ARE STILL ... YOUR PRIVATE THOUGHTS...

This article simply validates what I have already documented, and covered in terms of WHO and WHOM are the REAL HUMAN GUINEA PIGS - I stand by my belief that SOLO TARGET'S such as myself are DONE DEALS from HEAD to TOE, from GENOME TO DNA - What is of much more SIGNIFICANCE is MASS SUBJUGATION - CONTROLLING the MASSES.

Here is additional information that further Explains how the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency has long since been perfecting the Autonomous System that will have the capabilities or should I say, ALREADY HAS the BIO-TECHNOLOGICAL Capabilities to do EXACTLY THAT -

Narrative Networks

Solicitation Number: DARPA-BAA-12-03

Agency: Other Defense AgenciesOffice: Defense Advanced Research Projects AgencyLocation: Contracts Management Office

DARPA is soliciting innovative research proposals in the areas of (1) quantitative analysis of narratives, (2) understanding the effects narratives have on human psychology and its affiliated neurobiology, and (3) modeling, simulating, and sensing-especially in stand-off modalities-these narrative influences. Proposers to this effort will be expected to revolutionize the study of narratives and narrative influence by advancing narrative analysis and neuroscience so as to create new narrative influence sensors, doubling status quo capacity to forecast narrative influence.

 The most significant aspects of this Solicitation report that lead me to believe the True Guinea Pigs are not the Solo Targeted Individuals' but in fact the Communities, Organizations, Groups,  being RADICALIZED by these Narrative Network aka Psychological Operation Team or Teams, drop shipping into communities where Targets' reside, and radicalizing these Recruited Community Members' based on Negative False Light Narratives about the Target, so as to Study their Radicalization Into Extremism, whereby they as a group or individuals within are willing to commit Targeted Acts of Indiscriminate Violence upon and against that Set Up Solo Target.


See what I published, and sent to the Inspector General for the Department of Defense, Waste, Fraud, and Abuse based on what I termed - ONE STOP SHOP -  scroll down to HOW IT WORKS

What SEALS it - comes from a 2012 Synesis Journal written by two government employees for the United States Government about their FINDINGS on the Advances in Neuroscience, Nanoscience, Nanoneuroscience and NanoNeuro Technologies.

On the need for neurotechnology in the national intelligenceand defense agenda: Scope and trajectory 

Nano-neuroscience: Nano-substances and devices may be engineered to alter neural networks, induce changes in properties of the nervous system from periphery to brain, and affect sensitivity to internal and/or external stimuli. Nano-neurotechnologies could therefore be used to modify cognitive, emo- tional and/or behavioral functions, and in this way af- fect mental and motor capacity, alter mood or cause near- and long-term disability. Such capability might be used to modify the function of national intelligence and security personnel, and/or could be employed in a) combat (both to enhance performance of troops, as well as impair function of enemy warfighters) and/or b) by our enemies as a form of biological-technological terrorism and a means of mass subjugation.

Solo Targeted Individual's such as myself Do Not Represent the Masses, we as victim's represent exactly that individual victim's - If, it is already being discussed within the Defense Departments as Knowing these Neurotechnologies and NanoNeurotechnologies can be used by enemy Governments as a form of BIOLOGICAL-TECHNOLOGICAL TERRORISM and a MEANS OF MASS SUBJUGATION - then ALL THE RESEARCH is going to be focused, NOT on SOLO TARGET'S spread throughout the United States, but HOW NEUROTECHNOLOGIES CAN BE USED TO MANIPULATE THE MASSES -

The point being, now the Experts are attempting to SELL THE NOTION that MAYBE IT WOULD BE ETHICAL to ZAP SOMEONE'S BRAIN INTO MORAL AND ETHICAL COMPLIANCE -

DARPA BRAIN IMPLANTS FOR BRAIN-MACHINE INTERFACES

(Scroll down to PDF of actual Email sent to the LAW and NEUROSCIENCE PROJECT dated 2010)

2012 PUBLIC COMMENTARY TO THE PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION FOR THE STUDY OF BIOETHICAL ISSUES

This was sent in Feb, 2012 to the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues - What you will also note in the email to this Presidential Commission, is I called out Neuroscience and Neurotechnologies before Obama outlined it in his 2013 State of the Union Address, from the Genome project to the Brain Project - and I nailed and outlined Information Operations - which came out in the classified Edward Snowden Documents in 2013.  The first time I truly identified the Operations and How I believed it was working was via a formal written complaint in 2010 to the Inspector General for the Department of Defense, regarding Waste, Fraud, and Abuse...  

The point being - DOCUMENTING MAKES A SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN BEING VALIDATED - ABOUT THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES BEING DEPLOYED AND EXECUTED UNDER FALSE FLAG OPERATIONS ON THE STREET OF AMERICA UPON AND AGAINST NOT JUST SOLO TARGET'S BUT ALSO ENTIRE COMMUNITIES ....

In addition the MILITARIZED, Offensive Weaponized Use of Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurotechnologies and the Transmission of vocal and or digital code, which translates directly into the sleeping subconscious as verbal commands - not unlike Hypnosis and Post Hypnotic Suggestions Tied to Triggers is the most insidious, pure and concentrated form of BIOLOGICAL-TECHNOLOGICAL TERRORISM and MUST BE COUNTERED BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY!!!!

- The point being, Target's can be triggered and influenced via these weaponized NEUROTECHNOLOGIES but the KEYWORDS will always be true:

NON CONSENSUAL
AGAINST YOUR WILL
WITHOUT YOUR CONSENT
 
COERCIVE FORCE
COERCIVE MECHANICAL FORCE
NO ACCIDENTS 

NO WILLING SUICIDES - COERCED MURDER I.E. SUICIDED BY EXTERNAL THIRD PARTIES.

(As a Targeted Victim of Weaponized Neuroscience/Neurotechnologies, Nano-neurotechnologies, and Neural Linguistic Programing, you MUST DOCUMENT for legal purposes that THERE ARE NO VOLUNTARY SUICIDES on your part in any willing manner.

That should something happen to you, YOU ARE DEMANDING an officials CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION into YOUR MURDER .. MUST TRANSPIRE.

Some example of cognitive manipulating that appear to transpire with Target's via these Neuro-Weapons, and Neural Linguistic Programming, based on being triggered and or influenced to: hang yourself, shoot yourself in the head, drive your car off the road, take an overdose, basically some form of self inflicted harm, that YOU ARE NOT DOING THIS WILLINGLY but through external third party -TRIGGERS, which is Tantamount to MURDER in the FIRST.

THE POINT - ANYTHING THAT HAPPENS TO YOU AS THE VICTIM OF TARGETING IS ALWAYS TO BE INVESTIGATED AS MURDER IN THE FIRST - and to ENSURE YOU HAVE DOCUMENTED THIS EVERYWHERE IN THE DIGITAL REALM, IN WRITING, IF POSSIBLE NOTARIZED TO ENSURE A FULL SCALE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION TAKES PLACE -

Documenting is my way of ENSURING it be known, ANYTHING, WHICH HAPPENS TO ME as a Targeted Victim of Non Consensual Human Subject Experimentation via the MILITARIZED, Offensive Weaponized use of Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurotechnologies, Nano-Neurotechnologies, Acoustic Weapons Transmission via Ultrasound, and Bone Conduction Infrasound, Verbal, Visual, Repetitive: Power Suggestion tied to Power Associations, and or Digital Coding Neural Linguistic Programming, most of which has been FORCED into my sleeping Subconscious (Post Hypnotic Suggestions Tied to External Triggers ( i.e. acoustic, visual, keywords, motion) -becomes COERCED, CONDITIONING, FORCED, AND CRIMINAL - 

I DO NOT SELF HARM VOLUNTARILY, nor WILLINGLY - as such ANYTHING that Transpires is to be CRIMINALLY INVESTIGATED - AS MURDER IN THE FIRST DEGREE ON THE PART OF EXTERNAL THIRD PARTY DOMESTIC BIOLOGICAL-TECHNOLOGICAL TERRORISTS.
 
AND MURDER IN THE FIRST DEGREE of TARGET VICTIMS 

YAHOO Says No Problems With Account: Recent Activities Shows ORANGEVALE, CA Accessing Account

26 April 2015

Just got off the phone with Yahoo because I was locked out of my account after reading what to do if you think your account has been compromised.

The first thing it tells you is to log into your account, go into account info, and then check for recent activities.

I decided to do this because on YAHOO's Main Page there is an Application that will Populate the Weather from Your Current Location, the Only Problem, it is NOT MY CURRENT LOCATION.

This is an Ongoing Problem whereby, the location continues to Default, NOT to MY CURRENT LOCATION, but to some UNKOWN REGION, generally several hours from where I am.  When I attempt to DEFAULT IT back to MY CURRENT LOCATION, BY MANUALLY ENTERING MY CURRENT ZIP CODE, it will NOT Accept my PHYSICAL LOCATION and CONTINUE TO BE SUPERSEDED by the Unknown Location.

As such, I decided to contact Yahoo, but they require you to Troubleshoot for yourself.  One of the request is to log into your account, go to your account information, and then click onto Recent Activities to see what has been going on with your account.  Upon doing this I noticed that in Fact a region in Sacramento, CA by the name of Orangevale, CA appeared to be accessing my account, illegally.  Since, I am approximately four plus hours from that region in Northern, CA - It was an immediate RED FLAG.

I notified YAHOO, printed the Recent Activities Report, along with Printed the Current Yahoo Main Page to SHOW what was transpiring.

I received an email response from Yahoo instructing me to Change My Password.  Yahoo now has what is known as a Second Security whereby, upon logging in from a New Location, you are then sent a Text Message with a numeric code that you are required to enter in order to access your account.  Upon changing the Password, the initial Text came in, but upon doing it again

1. The NUMERIC CODE was not recognized
2.The Changed Password was not recognized
3. The New Numeric Code request was NOT Sent to my PDA
4. Upon speaking with Yahoo, and attempting to access my account via them
a. The Automated System, Could not find my Yahoo Email Account, even though it Repeated each letter of my User Name/Log In
b. The Customer Service Representative was unable to initially FIND my account and wanted to know when was the last time I had logged into my account, even though I was calling because I had accessed the account to CHANGE THE PASSWORD
c. Showed NO TAMPERING from YAHOO's end, from which I told them that I have been VIDEO DOCUMENTING these INCIDENTS IN REAL TIME and HAVE POSTED THEM TO YOU TUBE - should they WANT TO VISUALLY SEE the number of Cyber Attacks
d. Sometimes, the Automated Search for YOUR LOCATION is in another Region -
1. When asked WHY IT WOULD NOT ACCEPT THE MANUAL OVERRIDE -
a. Could not answer this question
2. When asked WHAT IS THE POINT OF YOUR ONLINE SECURITY CHECK FOR COMPROMISES TO YOUR ACCOUNT - DOES YAHOO ASK THAT YOU CHECK YOUR RECENT ACTIVITIES FOLDER FOR ONLINE TAMPERING OF YOUR ACCOUNT -  IF, THE INFORMATION PROVIDED, AS YOU ARE NOW CLAIMING - DOES NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT ACCURATE INFORMATION?
a. Was not able to adequately answer this question

The Denial by Drew the so called Yahoo Representative, who emphatically stated he did not see Orangevale, CA on his End - and attempted to utilize the Minimization by stating this, along with "Well if you THINK or I am sorry you FEEL - which are SUBJECTIVE qualities of Disbelief, which places the Burden upon the Victim to WONDER.  This is WHY DOCUMENTING VISUALLY what type of Cyber Terrorism is transpiring - FULL STOPS - their ability to utilize this Stop/Loss Psychological Tactic to Minimize or Negating the MATERIAL REALITIES -

AS SUCH THE FOLLOWING WHICH IS DATE STAMPED WILL SHOW WHAT IS SHOWING WHEN I POPULATE THE MAIN PAGE FOR YAHOO - AND WHAT MY RECENT ACTIVITIES ARE SHOWING - EVEN THOUGH I AM FOUR PLUS HOURS SOUTH OF THEIR AUTOMATED IP Search, in this case for the Yahoo Main Page - WEATHER LOCATION CAPABILITY.

In addition, this Criminal, Warrantless Cyber / Online Access has affected ALL YAHOO Accounts that I utilize, meaning, once the Local ISP has been compromised, it follows all the way to ANY and ALL URL/WEBSITES you visit, and at some point is disrupted.  Also, it was not just accessing my Yahoo Email Account, upon utilizing the Secondary Security which sends you a Numeric Code to your PDA / Cell Phone - I did not receive the Text Message with the New Numeric Code because the Account would NO LONGER Accept the NEW PASSWORD - What this shows is that my Cell Phone Communication, which runs off of T-Mobile Network was ALSO interrupted/interfered with.

The WARRANTLESS, Criminal Capability being utilized is called MAN-IN-THE-MIDDLE

It is IMPERATIVE that you DOCUMENT ALL INCIDENTS and provide or keep the MATERIAL EVIDENCE /INFORMATION and or Post IT EVERYWHERE ONLINE.  This way it will FULL STOPS the Service Representative from attempting to Utilize MINIMIZATION or NEGATION Tactics, and Techniques, because you are PHYSICALLY HOLDING MATERIAL EVIDENCE to what YOU ARE DESCRIBING.  

The Print Screen from the Yahoo Main Page, with a New Location Default on the Weather - Orangevale, CA 

The Recent Activities Report from One of Two Yahoo Email Accounts that I access, although BOTH ACCOUNTS show the same information in terms of Recent Activities of Log In Location Information - It appears to have started approximately (7) Days Ago from this Report.  Prior to that the Automated Location finder was Accurate (Monterey, CA) 

LAY PERSON'S EXPLANATION ON THE PHYSICS OF SOUND TRANSMISSION

23 April 2015

For those New Targeted Individual's who sustain Severe Voice to Skull, my sympathies to you.

I do not receive the Voice to Skull, but I am Acoustically Harassed by a perpetual Noise Campaign, utilizing recordable external (outside), directional transmission of Frequencies and Acoustic Sounds i.e. infrasonic and ultrasonic vibrations, extreme high and low vibratory frequencies, pitches, and pulses.  Not unlike Tinnitus, the ONLY DIFFERENCE, I have been able to record and post to You Tube the actual EXTERNAL (Outside) Directional Sound Blasting.

Much of the ACOUSTIC NOISE CAMPAIGN conducted by NEIGHBORS who have set up the Acoustic Weapons on their Property, are simply Directing and Projecting various frequencies through an Ultrasound/Hypersonic Acoustic Sound System of Pre-Recorded NOISE/Frequencies.

This can transmit into your living space as sonic VIBRATIONS (see Tuning Fork Placed Against Glass in Video)  Also, do research on Bone Conduction Technologies,  Train windows broadcasting ads into your head   , REVIEW - Aftershokz - Bone Conduction Headphones   , Kyocera Urbano Progresso hands-on   

What can also happen for those who receive Voices in their Heads (V2K), which is simply harnessing, then utilizing the Physics of Acoustic Vibrations to TRANSMIT Vocals, not unlike my receiving a perpetual NOISE CAMPAIGN of Blasting External Noises/Frequencies/Vibrations without Words.

There is NO MAGIC, it is all MATHEMATICS and PHYSICS and it is being deployed by recurited Individual's with Criminal Access to NOICE TRANSMITTING ACOUSTIC WEAPONS.  Not knowing the Department of Defense and the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency is USING them to FIELD TEST, Alpha and Beta Test their Weaponized Non Lethal Capabilities.

The following You Tube Video is an Excellent lay person explanation on Acoustic Sound and How It Works.  VIBRATIONS are the Key in the Transmission of Sound and Recognition of Words, i.e. the BRAIN recognizes specific vibrations and translates those vibrations into recognizable words.

This also gives a very lay explanation on how Brain Manipulations via Transcranial Magnetic Stimulations (tMS) or Synaptic/Neuronal Manipulations when pulsed through the human skull at targeted neurons, act to disrupt, activate, deactivate, stimulate, disorganize various synaptic processing i.e cognitive, motor, central nervous system and or behavioral functions.

Remember, tMS are simply an acoustic frequency that translates into an electromagnetic resonance i. - this allows medical to conduct imaging of the human biology, or in the case of Brain Manipulation a electromagnetic pulse fired through the human skull into targeted regions of the human brain, can MANIPULATE those Synaptic functions i.e. speech, motion, visual, motor, behavioral, pain, etc... 

ALL OF IT IS BASED ON THE PHYSICS OF ACOUSTIC SOUNDS, FREQUENCIES and VIBRATIONS and HOW IT IS ALL HARNESSED INTO A DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONIZED CAPABILITY.

Top 10 Demonstrations with Tuning Forks   

Sony Pictures Entertainment, along with Fellow Entities still LIABLE for : Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress:

21 April 2015

 (note: due to criminal, illegal backdoor access, my ability to edit this document and clean up text is being severely hindered, as such, you will need to click on the actual California Codes and LAWS in reference to : INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS)

Reading through some of the Wikileaks published Sony Documents, I came an email that was discussing liabilities, and Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress - this led me to start looking up the definition, and laws that pertained to what this legal representative was discussing in the email -


LOW and BEHOLD - I found an entire Series of California Codes, which can be LEVIED upon and against State, Corporate, Academia, Private and or Public Entities,  Organizations, Groups and or Individuals' within whose positions of authority, expertise and or power; sponsored, sanctioned, and covered up their direct and or indirect participation in Targeting an Individual and or using a Human Target for Non Consensual Human Experiments and or Target Practice.

And, because I became aware that I was being DIRECTLY TARGETED while in the Workplace at Sony Pictures Entertainment, via information provided by an external unknown third party, who provided Sony Pictures Entertainment with the means to Retaliate, Exploit, Deploy and Execute Professional Psychological Operations: tactics, techniques, access and utilization of weaponized and militarized technological means, via Public Disclosure of Privately Held Information, stored and or conducted within the Privacy of my living space, to include, but not limited to: Private Papers, Financial Information, Banking, Medical, Private Landline and Cell Phone Conversations, Online Purchases and Online Searches, and WHAT was being conducted within the privacy of my home that were fully embraced, exploited, and utilized in the Workplace via Peers and Management known or unknown to them the full content or meaning, while executing a Psychological Tactic of KEYWORD Associations - in Conduct known as Workplace Harassment and Workplace Mobbing - which ultimately Traumatized and Terrorized me out of my job, from which I left, NEVER TO RETURN due to the HOSTILE NATURE of what was being INTENTIONALLY INFLICTED upon and against me.

 THIS BECOMES RELEVANT for Future Claims against Sony Pictures Entertainment via existing, which can be levied against Sony Pictures Entertainment, and the Third Party Entity that provided Provided Sony Pictures Entertainment with Tactics and Techniques to use in the workplace based upon Warrantless, Privately Held Information in order to Psychologically Terrorize me out of my job.

WHY the STATUTE OF LIMITATION DOES NOT APPLY - SO LONG AS WHAT TRANSPIRED THEN, CONTINUES TO TRANSPIRE TODAY - in SIMILAR FASHION - IT IS ONGOING CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES - As such, ONLY WHEN EVERYTHING FULL STOP, CEASE AND DESISTS - Does the CLOCK ON ANY and ALL STATUTES BEGIN.

Therefore, SONY continues to be CRIMINAL LIABLE for what TRANSPIRED in the Workplace that literally Terrorized me out of my job.

Series 1600 - Emotional Distress

California Civil Jury Instructions (CACI)

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress—Essential Factual Elements

[Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant]’s conduct caused [him/her] to suffer severe emotional distress. To establish this claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove all of the following:

1. That [name of defendant]’s conduct was outrageous;

2. [That [name of defendant] intended to cause [name of plaintiff] emotional distress;]

[or]

[That [name of defendant] acted with reckless disregard of the probability that [name of plaintiff] would suffer emotional distress, knowing that [name of plaintiff] was present when the conduct occurred;]

3. That [name of plaintiff] suffered severe emotional distress; and

4. That [name of defendant]’s conduct was a substantial factor in causing [name of plaintiff]’s severe emotional distress.

New September 2003

Directions for Use

CACI Nos. 1602—1604, regarding the elements of intentional infliction of emotional distress, should be given with the above instruction.

Depending on the facts of the case, a plaintiff could choose one or both of the bracketed choices in element 2.

Sources and Authority

• “A cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress exists when there is ‘(1) extreme and outrageous conduct by the defendant with the intention of causing, or reckless disregard of the probability of causing, emotional distress; (2) the plaintiff’s suffering severe or extreme emotional distress; and (3) actual and proximate causation of the emotional distress by the defendant’s outrageous conduct.’ A defendant’s conduct is ‘outrageous’ when it is so ‘extreme as to exceed all bounds of that usually tolerated in a civilized community.’ And the defendant’s conduct must be ‘intended to inflict injury or engaged in with the realization that injury will result.’ ” (Hughes v. Pair (2009) 46 Cal.4th 1035, 1050—1051 [95 Cal.Rptr.3d 636, 209 P.3d 963])
• “ ‘[I]t is generally held that there can be no recovery for mere profanity, obscenity, or abuse, without circumstances of aggravation, or for insults, indignities or threats which are considered to amount to nothing more than mere annoyances.’ ” (Yurick v. Superior Court (1989) 209 Cal.App.3d 1116, 1128 [257 Cal.Rptr. 665], internal citations omitted.)
• “It is not enough that the conduct be intentional and outrageous. It must be conduct directed at the plaintiff, or occur in the presence of a plaintiff of whom the defendant is aware.” (Christensen v. Superior Court (1991) 54 Cal.3d 868, 903—904 [2 Cal.Rptr.2d 79, 820 P.2d 181].)
• “Severe emotional distress [is] emotional distress of such substantial quantity or enduring quality that no reasonable man in a civilized society should be expected to endure it.” (Fletcher v. Western Life Insurance Co. (1970) 10 Cal.App.3d 376, 397 [89 Cal.Rptr. 78].)
• “ ‘It is for the court to determine whether on the evidence severe emotional distress can be found; it is for the jury to determine whether, on the evidence, it has in fact existed.’ ” (Fletcher, supra, 10 Cal.App.3d at p. 397, internal citation omitted.)
• “ ‘The law limits claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress to egregious conduct toward plaintiff proximately caused by defendant.’ The only exception to this rule is that recognized when the defendant is aware, but acts with reckless disregard of, the plaintiff and the probability that his or her conduct will cause severe emotional distress to that plaintiff. Where reckless disregard of the plaintiff’s interests is the theory of recovery, the presence of the plaintiff at the time the outrageous conduct occurs is recognized as the element establishing a higher degree of culpability which, in turn, justifies recovery of greater damages by a broader group of plaintiffs than allowed on a negligent infliction of emotional distress theory.” (Christensen, supra, 54 Cal.3d at pp. 905—906, internal citations omitted.)

1602. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress—“Outrageous Conduct” Defined

[Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant]’s conduct caused [him/her] to suffer severe emotional distress. To establish this claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove all of the following:

1. That [name of defendant]’s conduct was outrageous;

2. [That [name of defendant] intended to cause [name of plaintiff] emotional distress;]

[or]

[That [name of defendant] acted with reckless disregard of the probability that [name of plaintiff] would suffer emotional distress, knowing that [name of plaintiff] was present when the conduct occurred;]

3. That [name of plaintiff] suffered severe emotional distress; and

4. That [name of defendant]’s conduct was a substantial factor in causing [name of plaintiff]’s severe emotional distress.... 

• “ ‘The law limits claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress to egregious conduct toward plaintiff proximately caused by defendant.’ The only exception to this rule is that recognized when the defendant is aware, but acts with reckless disregard of, the plaintiff and the probability that his or her conduct will cause severe emotional distress to that plaintiff. Where reckless disregard of the plaintiff’s interests is the theory of recovery, the presence of the plaintiff at the time the outrageous conduct occurs is recognized as the element establishing a higher degree of culpability which, in turn, justifies recovery of greater damages by a broader group of plaintiffs than allowed on a negligent infliction of emotional distress theory.” (Christensen, supra, 54 Cal.3d at pp. 905—906, internal citations omitted.)

1603. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress—“Reckless Disregard” Defined

[Name of defendant] acted with reckless disregard in causing [name of plaintiff] emotional distress if:

1. [Name of defendant] knew that emotional distress would probably result from [his/her] conduct; or

2. [Name of defendant] gave little or no thought to the probable effects of [his/her] conduct.

Sources and Authority

• “[I]t is not essential to liability that a trier of fact find a malicious or evil purpose. It is enough that defendant ‘devoted little or no thought’ to probable consequences of his conduct.” (KOVR-TV, Inc. v. Superior Court(1995) 31 Cal.App.4th 1023, 1031—1032 [37 Cal.Rptr.2d 431], internal citation omitted.)
• The requirement of reckless conduct is satisfied by a showing that the defendant acted in reckless disregard of the probability that the plaintiff would suffer emotional distress. (Little v. Stuyvesant Life Insurance Co.(1977) 67 Cal.App.3d 451, 462 [136 Cal.Rptr. 653]; Cervantez v. J.C. Penney Co. (1979) 24 Cal.3d 579, 593 [156 Cal.Rptr. 198, 595 P.2d 975].)
• “Where reckless disregard of the plaintiff’s interests is the theory of recovery, the presence of the plaintiff at the time the outrageous conduct occurs is recognized as the element establishing a higher degree of culpability which, in turn, justifies recovery of greater damages by a broader group of plaintiffs than allowed on a negligent infliction of emotional distress theory.” (Christensen v. Superior Court (1991) 54 Cal.3d 868, 905 [2 Cal.Rptr.2d 79, 820 P.2d 181].)

1604. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress—“Severe Emotional Distress” Defined

Emotional distress includes suffering, anguish, fright, horror, nervousness, grief, anxiety, worry, shock, humiliation, and shame.

“Severe emotional distress” is not mild or brief; it must be so substantial or long lasting that no reasonable person in a civilized society should be expected to bear it. [Name of plaintiff] is not required to prove physical injury to recover damages for severe emotional distress.

1620. Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress—Direct Victim—Essential Factual Elements

[Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant]’s conduct caused [him/her] to suffer serious emotional distress. To establish this claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove all of the following:

1. That [name of defendant] was negligent;

2. That [name of plaintiff] suffered serious emotional distress; and

3. That [name of defendant]’s negligence was a substantial factor in causing [name of plaintiff]’s serious emotional distress.

Emotional distress includes suffering, anguish, fright, horror, nervousness, grief, anxiety, worry, shock, humiliation, and shame. Serious emotional distress exists if an ordinary, reasonable person would be unable to cope with it.

New September 2003

Directions for Use

The California Supreme Court has allowed plaintiffs to bring negligent infliction of emotional distress actions as “direct victims” in only three types of factual situations: (1) the negligent mishandling of corpses (Christensen v. Superior Court (1991) 54 Cal.3d 868, 879 [2 Cal.Rptr.2d 79, 820 P.2d 181]); (2) the negligent misdiagnosis of a disease that could potentially harm another (Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (1980) 27 Cal.3d 916, 923 [167 Cal.Rptr. 831, 616 P.2d 813]); and (3) the negligent breach of a duty arising out of a preexisting relationship (Burgess v. Superior Court (1992) 2 Cal.4th 1064, 1076 [9 Cal.Rptr.2d 615, 831 P.2d 1197]).

The judge will normally decide whether a duty was owed to the plaintiff as a direct victim. If the issue of whether the plaintiff is a direct victim is contested, a special instruction with the factual dispute laid out for the jury will need to be drafted.

This instruction should be read in conjunction with either CACI No. 401, Basic Standard of Care, or CACI No. 418, Presumption of Negligence per se.

This instruction is for use if the plaintiff is a “direct victim” of defendant’s negligent conduct. If the plaintiff witnesses the injury of another, use CACI No. 1621, Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress—Bystander—Essential Factual Elements.

Elements 1 and 3 of this instruction could be modified for use in a strict products liability case. A plaintiff may seek damages for the emotional shock of viewing the injuries of another when the incident is caused by defendant’s defective product. (Kately v. Wilkinson (1983) 148 Cal.App.3d 576, 587 [195 Cal.Rptr. 902].)

Sources and Authority

• “ ‘[The] negligent causing of emotional distress is not an independent tort but the tort of negligence …’ ‘The traditional elements of duty, breach of duty, causation, and damages apply. Whether a defendant owes a duty of care is a question of law. Its existence depends upon the foreseeability of the risk and upon a weighing of policy considerations for and against imposition of liability.’ ” (Marlene F. v. Affıliated Psychiatric Medical Clinic, Inc. (1989) 48 Cal.3d 583, 588 [257 Cal.Rptr. 98, 770 P.2d 278], internal citations omitted.)
• “ ‘Direct victim’ cases are cases in which the plaintiff’s claim of emotional distress is not based upon witnessing an injury to someone else, but rather is based upon the violation of a duty owed directly to the plaintiff.” (Wooden v. Raveling (1998) 61 Cal.App.4th 1035, 1038 [71 Cal.Rptr.2d 891], internal citations omitted.)
• “[D]uty is found where the plaintiff is a ‘direct victim,’ in that the emotional distress damages result from a duty owed the plaintiff ‘that is “assumed by the defendant or imposed on the defendant as a matter of law, or that arises out of a relationship between the two.” ’ ” (McMahon v. Craig (2009) 176 Cal.App.4th 222, 230 [97 Cal.Rptr.3d 555].)
• In a negligence action, damages may be recovered for serious emotional distress unaccompanied by physical injury: “We agree that the unqualified requirement of physical injury is no longer justifiable.” (Molien, supra, 27 Cal.3d at p. 928.)
• “[S]erious mental distress may be found where a reasonable man, normally constituted, would be unable to adequately cope with the mental stress engendered by the circumstances of the case.” (Molien, supra, 27 Cal.3d at pp. 927—928.)

Secondary Sources

6 Witkin, Summary of California Law (10th ed. 2005) Torts, § 1004

1 California Torts, Ch. 5, Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress, § 5.03 (Matthew Bender)

32 California Forms of Pleading and Practice, Ch. 362, Mental Suffering and Emotional Distress, § 362.11 (Matthew Bender)

15 California Points and Authorities, Ch. 153, Mental Suffering and Emotional Distress, § 153.31 et seq. (Matthew Bender

THERE IS A LONG LIST OF CALIFORNIA LAWS THAT FALL WITHIN THESE PERAMETERS, AS SUCH THE FOLLOWING APPLIES TO ALL WORKPLACE SETTINGS WHERE TARGETED INDIVIDUAL WAS HARASSED OUT OF THEIR JOBS

2005 California Civil Code Sections 3294-3296 Article 3. Exemplary Damages

(a) In an action for the breach of an obligation not arising

from contract, where it is proven by clear and convincing evidence

that the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice,
the plaintiff, in addition to the actual damages, may recover damages for the sake of example and by way of punishing the defendant.

(b) An employer shall not be liable for damages pursuant to

subdivision (a), based upon acts of an employee of the employer,
unless the employer had advance knowledge of the unfitness of the
employee and employed him or her with a conscious disregard of the
rights or safety of others or authorized or ratified the wrongful
conduct for which the damages are awarded or was personally guilty of
oppression, fraud, or malice.  With respect to a corporate employer,
the advance knowledge and conscious disregard, authorization,
ratification or act of oppression, fraud, or malice must be on the
part of an officer, director, or managing agent of the corporation.

(c) As used in this section, the following definitions shall

apply:

(1) "Malice" means conduct which is intended by the defendant to

cause injury to the plaintiff or despicable conduct which is carried
on by the defendant with a willful and conscious disregard of the
rights or safety of others.

(2) "Oppression" means despicable conduct that subjects a person

to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of that person's

rights


(3) "Fraud" means an intentional misrepresentation, deceit, or

concealment of a material fact known to the defendant with the

intention on the part of the defendant of thereby depriving a person

of property or legal rights or otherwise causing injury.

THIS ONE IS FOR ANY FAMILY MEMBER'S OF A DECEASED TI WHO CAME FORWARD TO THEM, AND ANY AND ALL PROPER AUTHORITIES ABOUT BEING A VICTIM OF TARGETING - AS THEIR DEATHS REPRESENT MURDER IN THE FIRST DEGREE BY DEFENDANTS JOHN AND JANE DOE 

(d) Damages may be recovered pursuant to this section in an action

pursuant to Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 377.10) of Title 3 of
Part 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure based upon a death which

cted
of a felony, whether or not the decedent died instantly or sur
resulted from a homicide for which the defendant has been conv
ivived

al injury for some period of time.  The procedures for joinder and consolidation contained in Section 377.62 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall apply to prevent multiple recoveries of punitive or exemplary damages based upon the same wrongful act 

Now ... the Question of Disclosing various pieces of information from the Wikileaks Sony's Leak Private Information? 
In 2006, Sony Pictures Entertainment FULLY CAPITALIZED and EXPLOITED to their Benefit and Advantage, PRIVATE INFORMATION about an EMPLOYEE, which was exposed and exploited upon in the Workplace, this was how I learned I was being TARGETED. 

That "they" i.e. (Sony Pictures Entertainment) with intentional, malicious intent did cause extreme levels of distress, trauma, terror, fear for security, and safety of private living space, by deploying and executing tactics and techniques that were provided to them by this unknown External Third Party, whom I shall refer to as a Government and or Private Security Firm with warrantless, and criminal access to cutting edge cyber, telecommunication surveillance capabilities, along with human intelligence who gained illegal access to my living space and contents within, allowing them to conduct an extensive Profile upon every aspect of my living life - and SHARED/PROVIDED Sony Pictures Entertainment with this information, to utilize as a Weapon in order to Retaliate, Traumatize, and Terrorize me out of the workplace.  

What is the QUOTE that was used by a Sony Employee in Development by the name of LISA who said: "HOW LONG ARE WE GOING TO DO THIS TO HER?  OH, THAT'S RIGHT, WE HAVE MORE MONEY THAN SHE DOES...ha, ha, ha... "   There are some things you NEVER FORGET and the SHEER HUBRIS of Sony in what they were doing to me in the workplace, while I was Terrorized and Traumatized by what was being done - TO ME …

 I almost LOST MY LIFE because of it, and that is WHY I FEEL ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TOWARDS SONY ..  OTHER THAN CONTEMPT - and HAPPINESS AT ALL THEIR PRIVATE INFORMATION BEING PUBLICLY DISCLOSED -

Feels REAL SHITTY - Doesn't it SONY?



KARMA IS A MOTHER-FUCKING BITCH ...  and I did not have to do anything to PROVE what ARROGANCE, NARCISSISM, AND HUBRIS runs rampant there, someone did it for me and I AM TRULY GRATEFUL to the HACKERS that EXPOSED SONY...  and to WIKILEAKS for publishing  it.  

SONY PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT TROVE OF LEAKS - WIKILEAKS PUBLISHES: HOW TO TAMPER WITH WEBSITES ACCESS

19 April 2015


The following information comes from Wikileaks has posted the vast majority of the Sony Pictures Entertainment (SPE) Hacking Scandal LEAKED DOCUMENTS, and SONY ARCHIVES to include their discussions about becoming involved in, "Blocking Domains" from being accessed by individuals'.

This is a small example of how extensive Sony Pictures Entertainment in particular have a very close relationship with the U.S. Government, in particular the Department of Defense / NSA,  Alpha Agencies, and external third party corporate alliances.

The three page document is of interest to any Targeted Individual, such as myself who sustains heavy Electronic Warfare, Computer Network Exploitation, and Computer Network Attacks, in which I have been constantly and continually denied access, sent to a fake website, timed out, slowed down, via Man-In-The-Middle, Man-On-The-Side, Malware, Spyware, and other Application Coding to Disrupt, Deny, Degrade, and/or Destroy desktop and online capabilities - based upon criminal, warrantless access and interferences.

The documents provide a very good Explanation of WHAT Transpires, and HOW it can be done, while utilizing the Internet, and Sony, along with others from within the Entertainment Industry have discussed ways in which, "They" could block an individual from accessing various Domains/Websites.

The best way to view the document is to 

1. Click on the Document

2. Right Click to "Open Image in Another Window"

3. You will see a magnifying glass - click and the document will enlarge

WHY DO I CARE ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR LEAK?

Because, I BELIEVE in KARMA - and this is PURE and CONCENTRATED KARMA against Sony Pictures Entertainment - and I did not have to do a thing for it to come around...  

As it is known, I was a former Employee of Sony Pictures Entertainment in the Television Production Accounting division, working as a Senior Production Accountant - UNTIL - they were approached by an EXTERNAL third party who had Profiled, Privately Held Information about me, to include INFORMATION about what I had i.e. papers, documents, spending habits, online searches, etc that were placed, hidden, or done within the privacy of my HOME.

THIS INFORMATION WAS THEN PROVIDED TO SONY PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT, ALONG WITH PSY-OPERATORS - TO ASSIST in how to DEPLOY and UTILIZE their ACCESS to private information held or conducted within the privacy of my HOME - utilizing KEYWORD-ASSOCIATIONS, so as to let me know - THE INFORMATION was UNIQUE or ONLY KNOWN to ME.   THE ABSOLUTE INVASION OF PRIACY AND SHEER TERROR - of an External third party (GOVERNMENT) sharing your PRIVATE INFORMATION with a Corporation (SONY) to Terrorize, Traumatize, and Harass you out of your JOB -


IT STARTED IN THE WORKPLACE at SONY PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT   

BOSTON BOMBING - APPEARS TWO HANDLERS TRIGGERED THE BROTHERS Tsarnaev

05 April 2015

TWO HANDLER'S : PRIMARY HANDLER IN WHITE TRIGGER'S, SECONDARY HANDLER IN DARK, WHO USES VISUAL HAND MOTIONS AND TOUCH TO  TRIGGER
The 
Tsarnaev Brother's

(Note:  I DO NOT Condone what transpired, OR am attempting to discount what these Brother's were involved in and ultimately committed  THE QUESTIONS I am posting on this Blog are what I NOTICED upon taking a GOOD LOOK at the Surveillance Video's and WHAT I IMMEDIATELY RECOGNIZED via the two men, one of whom was UTILIZING VISUAL, MOTION and ULTIMATELY TOUCH as TRIGGERS - )

I have been busy with other things, and have not had time to really look at the Surveillance Video's of the Tsarnaev Brother's Surveillance video's during the Boston, MA Bombing.  Due to the Current Trial of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, I decided to re-look at the surveillance video's via You Tube. 

Upon looking at them, I recognized something that transpired by TWO OTHER Men, which leads me to believe that the Tsarnaev Brother's were TRIGGERED into Action by Handler's.

Below,  I have captured Screen Shots of the TWO MEN in QUESTION.  They are Highlighted in a Rectangle Square:  They are Facing the Surveillance Camera, while the Two Tsarnaev's have their backs to the camera and are highlighted via a Black Circle (Tamerlan) and White Circle (Dzhokhar)


The HANDLER'S -  Bald male wearing a White Jacket is the PRIMARY HANDLER who Triggers the the male next to him, with Dark Hair Wearing a Dark Jacket - This Trigger's the male in the Dark Jacket and Sunglasses to immediately start what is known as Post Hypnotic Suggestion TRIGGERING via  VISUAL HAND/MOTION Signals - (Touching Hair, Saluting, Touching Dzhokhar on the Shoulder, then finishes with other upper facial hand motions) -

WHO ARE THOSE TWO MEN?  Because the BALD MALE appears to be the Primary Handler, who Triggers' the dark haired male in sunglasses next to him, who then Triggers' the Tsarnaev Brothers' into full action. 

You also need to REMEMBER that the Older Tamerlan Tsarnaev circled in Black - stated that He was HEARING VOICES, and believed he was being Mind Controlled.

Tamerlan Tsarnaev believed he was being fed orders through ‘majestic mind control’

 

What transpired are VISUAL, along with MOTION and TOUCH TRIGGERS - 

STARTS AT: 0:28 / 2:04 into video and you will see the TRIGGERS - being put into Motion in public.

Boston Marathon Surveillance
(for best Viewing, enlarge video to normal size or click above link to take you to the You Tube video)

THE HANDLERS'

Facing Surveillance Camera - Bald Man who is the Primary Handler in the White Jacket, and Dark Haired man in Dark Jacket is Triggered into Hand Signals that would be visual to the Tsaraev Brothers' they are (highlighted in the rectangle) - Male in White See's the Tsarnaev's and lets the Male in Dark Jacket know - You will also notate the Symmetry in the Handlers' CLOTHING -  One in White Jacket, the Other in Dark/Black Jacket - and the Tsaraev Brothers One in a Dark Hat (Tamerlan),  the Other (Dzhokhar) in a White or Light Hat - Could be used as Visual Triggers upon seeing the Handler's One in White the other in Black - BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION fka MIND CONTROL utilizes SYMMETRY and SYNCHRONIZATION - via Power of SUGGESTION tied to Power of ASSOCIATION - 

 Upon seeing the first Tsarnaevs' - He IMMEDIATELY begins the HAND SIGNAL/MOTION by raising his right hand to his forehead -

 As he approaches the Tsarnaev in the Black Circle - it appears as a Salute

Note the Male in the White Jacket is ALWAYS behind the Male in the Dark Jacket - It also appears that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev in the backwards white baseball cap appears NOT to have seen the Salute by the triggered Handler -  

Which causes this Handler' to TOUCH Dzhkohar on the Shoulder - more than likely this Handler also SAID SOMETHING when he touched Dzhokhar in order to ANCHOR the TRIGGER because it appears Dzhkohar did not see the Original "SALUTE" the Handler used first on Tamerlane thus needing to be TOUCHED with a Verbal Command...  

The TRIGGERED Handler proceed with the hand motions, because he appears to still be under by the Primary Handler (bald male in white jacket)

More hand Gestures to complete the motion so as not to raise suspicion from anyone actually paying attention, or KNOWS how these TRIGGER'S are used in Public Settings - 

WHO ARE THE TWO MEN, in PARTICULAR the BALD MALE who is actually CONTROLLING the ENTIRE EVENT -