Sunday, May 31, 2015


31 May 2015

The following Videos were taken Directly Overhead, and show only in the overhead, and surrounding area what I call, "CLOUD STREAKS/LINES" whereby, there is no formation of clouds, but simply cloud streaks.

THIS IS MY THEORY and BY NO MEANS DEFINITIVE PROOF but I have documented this OVERHEAD in Los Angeles as well during the night, and it actually messed with the infrared on the video camera.  

Upon me doing a Panoramic View, you will see that these, 'CLOUD STREAKS" are only directly Overhead and in a Surrounding Area, but ALL OTHER areas, are formed clouds or clouded over. 

What this leads me to believe is that the EXPERIMENTS being conducted are NOT about Control over a Solo Targeted Individual, but to FIRE UP and ENTIRE ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD in a given Geographical Location and CONTROL the BEHAVIORS of those SURROUNDING the Solo Targeted Individual.

Video Taped on the Monterey Peninsula, 31 May 2015

Video Taped in Koreatown, Los Angeles, CA - November, 2013
These videos are much harder to view because while I was attempting to tape via the infrared in the camera, there was some type of interference and caused distortion, but there are shots when the camera is still where you can see the actual lines in the sky or cloud streaks.  

Thursday, May 28, 2015


28 May 2015

The following two articles will further Validate for those Targeted Individual's who have long since accused those within Medical, Psychiatry/Psychology, and world of Academia have been directly involved in the criminal, illegal, non consensual Human Experiments' being conducted on unsuspecting individual's without their knowledge and or consent. 

From my Website published in 2011 on ONE STOP SHOP - and how those within these fields of Expertise have in fact actively participated, covered up, sanctioned, and sponsored the heinous and egregious crimes against the human life and humanity of a defenseless Targeted Victim. 

Places every aspect of Targeted Individual human life, to include living situation into a Laboratory and Breeding Ground Setting for recruitment, training, and deployment of operations, to include inviting experts from Science, Technology, Education, Corporate, and Medical to see how their REAL TIME HUMAN GUINEA PIG is doing, then do an analysis in order to advance their experimental agendas
This includes Extensive training in Military and other Agencies Expertise in the field of:  Information Operations Roadmap, and their Five Core Capabilities, in concert with specified supporting and related capabilities:
(1) Psychological Operations, (2) Military Deception, (3) Operations Security, (4) Computer Network Operations, and (5) Electronic Warfare.

On April 26, 2015, Jeffrey Lieberman, former president of the American Psychiatric Association, stirred up controversy by calling investigative journalist Robert Whitaker a “menace to society [3]” on CBC radio [4] because Whitaker, in his book Anatomy of an Epidemic [5], had challenged the long-term effectiveness of psychiatric medication.

But is it Whitaker or Lieberman who is a menace to society?

Lieberman, the APA president through May 2014, is currently making the media rounds with his new book Shrinks [6]. But earlier in his career, Lieberman conducted experiments in which patients diagnosed with schizophrenia were given a psychostimulant drug with Lieberman’s expectation that the drug would be “psychotogenic” (induce symptoms of psychosis), and this deterioration in fact occurred.

Robert Whitaker, as an investigative journalist, won the George Polk award for medical reporting and was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize for Public Service for his 1998 Boston Globe series “Doing Harm: Research on the Mentally Ill” (co-authored with Dolores Kong). In this series, Whitaker uncovered how Lieberman and other psychiatrists, exploring the biology of psychosis, conducted experiments on more than 2,000 patients in which certain drugs were administered and other drugs withheld in the expectation of worsening symptoms.

The Nuremberg Code of research ethics, established after the horrific human experiments by doctors in Nazi Germany, states that medical experiments on human subjects “should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.” This is obvious ethics, as one would hope that only Nazi doctors would see nothing wrong with using human subjects to test whether hypothesized harmful agents are in fact harmful.

Lieberman’s Experiments
In his Globe series, Whitaker details how psychotic symptom exacerbation and provocation experiments were pioneered in 1974 by David Janowsky, who reported success in developing a new tool for studying schizophrenia. Janowsky found that giving diagnosed schizophrenics the psychostimulant drug methylphenidate (Ritalin, Concerta) caused “a dramatic intensification of pre-existing symptoms, such as hallucinations and delusions” and that other psychostimulants such as amphetamines also exacerbated psychosis. Janowsky’s work established the idea that psychosis-inducing drugs could be used as “challenge agents” for studying psychosis.

In Lieberman’s own 1987 review [7] of 36 studies in which psychostimulant drugs were administered to patients diagnosed with schizophrenia, he concluded that among psychostimulant drugs, methylphenidate has the greatest “psychotogenic potency.” And so Lieberman, in his subsequent experimentation on patients diagnosed with schizophrenia, administered methylphenidate, the psychostimulant with greatest likelihood to do damage.

In 1987, Lieberman conducted a study [8] in which he administered methylphenidate to 34 stable outpatients previously diagnosed with schizophrenia. In this experiment, previously stabilized patients were not only administered methylphenidate but taken off standard antipsychotic drugs until psychotic symptoms reappeared.

In a 1990 study [9] co-authored by Lieberman, “Behavioral Response to Methylphenidate and Treatment Outcome in First Episode Schizophrenia,” the introduction states, “In order to examine the relationship of psychotogenic response to psychostimulants and acute treatment response in treatment-naïve, first-episode psychotic patients, we administered intravenous methylphenidate to first-episode patients.”

On the face of it, this experiment, in which a drug is administered to induce a psychotic reaction, is cruel enough. But it gets worse. Lieberman’s subjects were as young as 14 years old, and he did this experiment on “first-episode psychotic patients,” the majority of whom, research shows [10], ordinarily recover. Lieberman reports that the symptom of distrustfulness “significantly increased following the administration of methylphenidate.” So, after having a psychotic episode, patients are intravenously administered a psychostimulant drug designed to induce more psychotic behaviors, and they become more distrustful. It would be remarkable if such “treatment” would not make someone distrustful of doctors, perhaps for the remainder of their lives.

Lieberman reports his schizophrenic subjects and their families were “willing and able to sign informed consent.” The Nuremberg Code states: “The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have the legal capacity to give consent.” Who in their right mind would give consent for themselves or for a family member for a procedure that was hypothesized to make a patient worse?

In Whitaker’s Globe 1998 series in the segment “Testing Takes Human Toll [11],” he interviewed Lieberman about his and other psychotic symptom exacerbation and provocation experiments. Lieberman asserted, “To say that increasing a particular symptom—like hearing voices for a couple of hours in somebody who has been hearing voices for 10 years—is causing [suffering] rather seems like a stretch.”

Beyond the callousness of his response, Lieberman is simply not telling the truth. Recall his 1990 study was done on “first-episode psychotic patients,” not on people who had been “hearing voices for 10 years.”

Lieberman is elsewhere dishonest—or amazingly ignorant. In justifying why he called Whitaker a menace to society, Lieberman stated on CBC radio that research does not support Whitaker’s claim that many people diagnosed with serious mental illness do better in the long term without psychiatric medication. But the validity of Whitaker’s claim was acknowledged [12] in 2013 by the director of the National Institute of Mental Health who pointed to some of the same research as had Whitaker. The NIMH director in fact concluded, “We need to ask whether in the long-term, some individuals with a history of psychosis may do better off medication.” It is difficult to imagine that Lieberman is ignorant of the NIMH director’s agreement with Whitaker.

Lieberman’s psychotic symptom exacerbation and provocation studies are not his only experiments that have upset ethicists. Lieberman’s CAFE [13]  (Comparison of Atypicals in First Episode of Psychosis) study on the effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs, conducted between 2002-2005, has been severely criticized [14] by Carl Elliott, bioethics professor at the University of Minnesota. Elliott detailed how one CAFE subject who committed suicide was coerced into the study, and because of his psychotic state was incapable of giving informed consent.

Why Would APA Elect Lieberman President?
Whitaker’s Boston Globe series was actually not about Lieberman per se but was really an indictment of the institution of psychiatry for large-scale psychotic inducement research. Whitaker wrote:
In their published accounts, doctors have told of injecting mentally ill patients with drugs designed to exacerbate their delusions and hallucinations. In prestigious journals, they have described studies in which they withheld effective antipsychotic medication from desperate patients who stumbled into hospital emergency rooms. In precise, clinical terms, they have reported how they deliberately stopped giving medication to stabilized schizophrenic patients to see how quickly they became sick again. These studies were designed to gain knowledge that might lead to improved treatments for schizophrenia and related illnesses. But the experiments offered no possibility of therapeutic benefit to the subjects and exposed them to some measure of psychic pain and risk of long-term harm. Moreover, this controversial line of experimentation has been marked by repeated instances in which researchers failed to fully disclose the risks to the mentally ill patients and obscured their true purposes.
Adil Shamoo, professor of biochemistry at the University of Maryland School of Medicine and founder of the journal Accountability in Research, compared these psychotic symptom exacerbation and provocation studies to the Tuskegee syphilis studies [15] in which infected black men were denied treatment. Shamoo told Whitaker in 1998, “I think [these psychotic provocation experiments] are in a category that is worse than Tuskegee. . .There are large numbers [of subjects], and these are current practices. Do they cause harm? Of course they do.”

Psychotic exacerbation and provocation experiments, Whitaker reported, were conducted by prominent researchers at the National Institute of Mental Health and at close to a dozen leading medical schools. Patient subject for these studies were largely drawn from outpatient clinics, Veterans Affairs hospitals, state mental institutions, and emergency rooms—settings that regularly provide care to the poor and uninsured. Whitaker noted, “In the few studies that recorded the ethnic makeup of patients, 54 percent were minorities.”

Not surprisingly, Whitaker also discovered that researchers routinely failed to fully disclose the true purposes of their experiments, and withheld information about risks, “The Globe’s review of informed-consent forms for symptom-exacerbation studies at the NIMH [National Institute of Mental Health] and four other leading psychiatric institutions failed to turn up a single one in which the researchers directly stated that a chemical agent would be used purposely to exacerbate psychotic symptoms.”

George Annas, chairman of the Health Law Department at Boston University School of Public Health, told Whitaker, “We let researchers do things to people with mental illness that we would never let them do to people with physical illness.”

Why would the American Psychiatric Association elect Lieberman president in 2012? Because psychiatry sees nothing wrong with these psychotic symptom exacerbation and provocation experiments. 

Non-sociopathic people feel guilt or shame for having induced suffering in others, so how could the APA not feel guilt or shame about Lieberman and other psychiatrists conducting experiments that create psychotic symptoms and suffering? The answer to this question takes us to a very dark place.
Bruce E. Levine [16] is a practicing clinical psychologist. His latest book is Get Up, Stand Up: Uniting Populists, Energizing the Defeated, and Battling the Corporate Elite [17]

The University of Minnesota’s Medical Research Mess

MINNEAPOLIS — IF you want to see just how long an academic institution can tolerate a string of slow, festering research scandals, let me invite you to the University of Minnesota, where I teach medical ethics.

Over the past 25 years, our department of psychiatry has been party to the following disgraces: a felony conviction and a Food and Drug Administration research disqualification for a psychiatrist guilty of fraud in a drug study; the F.D.A. disqualification of another psychiatrist, for enrolling illiterate Hmong refugees in a drug study without their consent; the suspended license of yet another psychiatrist, who was charged with “reckless, if not willful, disregard” for dozens of patients; and, in 2004, the discovery, in a halfway house bathroom, of the near-decapitated corpse of Dan Markingson, a seriously mentally ill young man under an involuntary commitment order who committed suicide after enrolling, over the objections of his mother, in an industry-funded antipsychotic study run by members of the department.

And those, unfortunately, are just the highlights.

The problem extends well beyond the department of psychiatry and into the university administration. Rather than dealing forthrightly with these ethical breaches, university officials have seemed more interested in covering up wrongdoing with a variety of underhanded tactics. Reporting in The Star Tribune discovered, for example, that in the felony case, university officials hid an internal investigation of the fraud from federal investigators for nearly four years.

I hope that the situation at the University of Minnesota is exceptional. But I know that at least one underlying cause of our problems is not limited to us: namely, the antiquated bureaucratic apparatus of institutional review boards, or I.R.B.s, which are supposed to protect subjects of medical experimentation. Indeed, whether other institutions have seen the kinds of abuses that have emerged at the University of Minnesota is difficult to know, precisely because the current research oversight system is inadequate to detect them.

The current I.R.B. system of research protection arose in the 1970s. At the time, many reformers believed the main threat to research subjects came from overambitious government and university researchers who might be tempted to overlook the welfare of research subjects.

As a result, the scheme put in place for protecting subjects was not a formal regulatory system but essentially an honor code. Under the I.R.B. system, medical research studies are evaluated — on paper — by a panel of academic volunteers. I.R.B.s do not usually monitor research as it is taking place. They rarely see a research subject or even a researcher face to face. Instead, they simply trust researchers to tell the truth, report mishaps honestly and conduct their studies in the way that they claim to be conducting them.

These days, of course, medical research is not just a scholarly affair. It is also a global, multibillion-dollar business enterprise, powered by the pharmaceutical and medical-device industries. The ethical problem today is not merely that these corporations have plenty of money to grease the wheels of university research. It’s also that researchers themselves are often given powerful financial incentives to do unethical things: pressure vulnerable subjects to enroll in studies, fudge diagnoses to recruit otherwise ineligible subjects and keep subjects in studies even when they are doing poorly.
With so much money at stake in drug research, research subjects need a full-blown regulatory system. I.R.B.s should be replaced with oversight bodies that are fully independent — both financially and institutionally — of the research they are overseeing. These bodies must have the staffing and the authority to monitor research on the ground. And they must have the power to punish researchers who break the rules and institutions that cover up wrongdoing.

Here at the University of Minnesota, we have reached a critical point. Two months ago, after two blistering external investigations, university officials finally agreed to suspend recruitment for psychiatric drug studies. Yet they still refuse to admit any serious wrongdoing.

An honor code is a fragile thing. All the parts have to be in place: pride in the integrity of an institution, vigilant self-policing, a collective sense of shame when the code is violated and a willingness to punish those who break it. At the University of Minnesota, we have very few of those things. And so without sustained, relentless pressure from the outside, I am afraid we are doomed to more of the same.

Carl Elliott, a professor at the Center for Bioethics at the University of Minnesota, is the author of “White Coat, Black Hat: Adventures on the Dark Side of Medicine.”

Thursday, May 21, 2015

Subtle Exclusionary Tactics : Can Ultimately Turn Into : "Lebensunwertes Leben" - Life Unworthy of Life

21 May 2015

The following article posted in is a reminder that small, subtle, but exclusionary accounts begin to surface, which seems almost innocuous, but are ways in which to Exclude or find excuses to isolate those deemed 'unworthy' of equal respect and or consideration.  There is always a litany of narratives utilized to justify such behavior and or overt attitudes but deep down it is nothing more than ignorance, bigotry, and intolerance, which exists within the individuals, groups, organizations who fall prey to such beliefs. 

As a Targeted Individual this type of bigotry and ignorance will be deployed and executed upon and against your living life; where you live, where you work, where you shop, in public settings, whereby those who participate will be indoctrinated into a false belief system of superiority over the Target.  A sort of One-Ups-Manship, but ultimately they become those who acquiesce, and surrender their individual power over to the dictates of some leader and or leaders. 

What this article, like so many news stories that come out are showing is that the Behavior is becoming more and more prevalent in American Society, and the Intolerance and Bigotry is getting to the point of epidemic.  

Utah High School Excludes Special Needs Students From Appearing in Yearbook

This year, Leslee Bailey was stunned when she saw that her daughter Amber wasn't included in the Blue Peak High School yearbook as she had been in past years. Amber has Down syndrome and takes classes in the Utah high school building [2].
For the last two years, the school has always included the 17 special needs students from the center in the yearbook. However, this year, a change was made.
“They’ve been to school with these kids,” Leslee Bailey said. “They’ve walked the halls with them. How would you feel if it was your child? You know, your child was left out because, as the principal told me, ‘We don’t have the pages.’”
According to Tooele County School District, the reason for the change is that Blue Peak High School students used to help tutor the special needs students in the building but they no longer do. And because it's a transitional program via the county’s Community Learning Center designed for special needs students to progress from high school, they shouldn't be involved in activities like yearbook

Yet, these 21st Century Tactics and false beliefs are NOTHING NEW, even though this new nationwide multi-cultural, multi-ethnic, multi-religious, diverse socio-economic Cult of State/Corporate sponsored Sleeper Cells - believe that who they are and what their GROUP represents is something New Age, Cutting Edge, Modern - but in point of literal historic fact - they simply are the MIRROR of all other Mass Murdering Regimes before them.  Save the Technological Advances to speed up the process - there is most literally NOTHING NEW - in who or what or where the final solutions/outcomes reside.  


- NAZI, GERMANY  is KNOWN for Targeting their own citizens, those blights upon society whom the Nazi Regime felt were "life unworthy of life" in German: "Lebensunwertes Leben" and first began by convincing the German populous it would be in their best interest, the greater good to Sterilize those within their families, and society who were blights upon society.  

One of the first acts by Adolf Hitler after achieving total control over the German state was to pass the Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring (Gesetz zur Verhütung erbkranken Nachwuchses) in July 1933.

The basic provisions of the 1933 law stated that:
(1) Any person suffering from a hereditary disease may be rendered incapable of procreation by means of a surgical operation (sterilization), if the experience of medical science shows that it is highly probable that his descendants would suffer from some serious physical or mental hereditary defect.
(2) For the purposes of this law, any person will be considered as hereditarily diseased who is suffering from any one of the following diseases: –
(1) Congenital Mental Deficiency,
(2) Schizophrenia,
(3) Manic-Depressive Insanity,
(4) Hereditary Epilepsy,
(5) Hereditary Chorea (Huntington’s),
(6) Hereditary Blindness,
(7) Hereditary Deafness,
(8) Any severe hereditary deformity.
(3) Any person suffering from severe alcoholism may be also rendered incapable of procreation.[2]
 The SLOW POISONING of the MINDS of the PEOPLE -  
First Step: Sterilization of Your Own.. view these human beings as LESS THAN - NOT EQUAL -

By the end of the Nazi regime, over 200 "Genetic Health Courts" were created, and under their rulings over 400,000 people were sterilized against their will 

Second Step - "Mercy Kill / Euthanize" those Blights Upon Society -  Thus, "Lebensunwertes Leben" or "Life Unworthy of Life."

Euthanasia - the "mercy killing" of people "not worth living" became a murderous program in Nazi Germany. This campaign is believed to have resulted in the killing of approximately 200,000 people. Evidence from the Nuremburg trials estimated that even 275,000 people were murdered. ...

FINAL Step - Dominate the World with This IDEOLOGY - Target the NEXT GROUP for EXTERMINATION - The Holocaust 


WHY?  If, they could Sacrifice their own i.e. children, relatives, friends to Sterilization and then Mercy Kill them via Euthanasia  - It made it that much easier to MASSACRE in the MILLIONS whomever their LEADERS DEEMED UNWORTHY -

What may not be known is that this superior attitude had much of its root in America, in particular, Compulsory or Forced Sterilization, meaning the United States was already conducting forced sterilization on American's, long before the Nazi took this information and ran with it. 


The Horrifying American Roots of Nazi Eugenics
by Edwin Black

Hitler and his henchmen victimized an entire continent and exterminated millions in his quest for a so-called "Master Race."

But the concept of a white, blond-haired, blue-eyed master Nordic race didn't originate with Hitler.  The idea was created in the united States, and cultivated in California, decades before Hitler came to power.  California eugenicists played an important, although little known, role in the American eugenics movement's campaign for ethnic cleansing.  

Eugenics was the racist pseudoscience determined to wipe away all human beings deemed "unfit," preserving only those who conformed to a Nordic stereotype.  Elements of the philosophy were enshrined as national policy by forced sterilization and segregation laws, as well as marriage restrictions, enacted in twenty-seven states.  In 1909, California became the third state to adopt such laws.  Ultimately, eugenics practitioners coercively sterilized some 60,000 Americans, barred the marriage of thousands, forcibly segregated thousands in "colonies," and persecuted untold numbers in ways we are just learning.  Before World War II, nearly half of coercive sterilizations were done in California, and even after the war, the state accounted for a third of all such surgeries.

California was considered the epicenter of the American eugenics movement.  During the Twentieth Century's first decades California's eugenicists included potent but little known race scientists, such as Army venereal disease specialist Dr. Paul Popenoe, citrus magnate and Polytechnic benefactor Paul Gosney, Sacramento banker Charles M. Goethe, as well as members of the California State Board of Charities and Corrections and the University of California Board of Regents.  

Eugenics would have been so much bizarre parlor talk had it not been for extensive financing by corporate philanthropies, specifically the Carnegie Institution, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Harriman railroad forture.  They were all in league with some of America's most respected scientists hailing from such prestigious universities as Stanford, Yale, Harvard, and Princeton.  These academicians espoused race theory and race science, and then faked and twisted data to server eugenics' racists aims.  

Stanford president David Starr Jordan originated the notion of "race and blood" in his 1902 racial epistle "Blood of a Nation," in which the university scholar declared that human qualities and conditions such as talent and poverty were passed through the blood. 

In 1904, the Carnegie Institution established a laboratory complex at Cold Spring Harbor on Long Island that stockpiled millions of index cards of ordinary Americans, as researchers carefully plotted the removal of families, bloodlines and whole peoples.  From Cold Spring Harbor, eugenics advocates agitated in the legislature of America, as well as the nation's social service agencies and associations....

The Harriman railroad fortune paid local charities, such as the New York Bureau of Industries and Immigration, to seek out Jewish, Italian and other immigrants in New York and other crowded cities and subject them to deportation, trumped up confinement or forced sterilization. 

The Rockefeller Foundation helped found the German eugenics program and even funded the program that Josef Mengele worked in before he went to Auschwitz.  

Much of the spiritual guidance and political agitation for the American eugenics movement came from California's quasi-autonomous eugenic societies, such as the Pasadena-based Human Betterment Foundation and the California branch of the American Eugenics Society, which coordinated much of their activity with the Eugenics Research Society in Long Island.  These organizations -- which functioned as part of a closely-knit network--published racist eugenic newsletters and pseudo-scientific journals, such as Eugenical News and Eugenics, and propagandized for the Nazis.  

Eugenics was born as a scientific curiosity in the Victorian age.  In 1863, Sir Francis Galton, a cousin of Charles Darwin, theorized that if talented people only married other talented people, the result would be measurably better offspring.  At the turn of the last century, Galton's ideas were imported into the United States by Gregor Mendel's principles of heredity were rediscovered.  American eugenic advocates believed with religious fervor that the same Mendelian concepts determining the color and size of peas, corn and cattle also governed the social and intellectual character of man. 

In an American demographically reeling from immigration upheaval and torn by post-Reconstruction chaos, race conflict was everywhere in the early twentieth century.  Elitists, utopians and so-called "progressives" fused their smoldering race fears and class bias with their desire to make a better world.  They reinvented Galton's eugenics into a repressive and racists ideology.  The intent: populate the earth with vastly more of their own socio-economic and biological kin--and less or none of everyone else (21st Century is called GENTRIFICATION)

The superior species the eugenics movement sought was populated not merely by tall, strong, talented people.  Eugenicists craved blond, blue-eyed Nordic types.  This group along, they believed, was fit to inherit the earth. (21st Century Christian Identity Movement) In the process, the movement intended to subtract emancipated Negroes, immigrant Asian laborers, Indians, Hispanics, East Europeans, Jews, dark-haired hill folk, poor people, the infirm and really anyone classified outside the gentrified genetic lines drawn up by American raceologists. 

How?  By identifying so-called "defective" family trees and subjecting them to lifelong segregation and sterilization programs to kill their bloodlines. The grand plan was to literally wipe away the reproductive capability of those deemed weak and inferior--the so-called "unfit".  The eugenicists hoped to neutralize the viability of 10 percent of the population at a sweep, until none were left except themselves.  

Eighteen solutions were explored in a Carnegie-supported 1911 "Preliminary Report of the Committee of the Eugenic Section of the American Breeder's Association to Study and to Report on the Best Practical Means for Cutting Off the Defective Germ-Plasm in the Human Population."  Point eight was euthanasia.  

The most commonly suggested method of eugenicide in America was a "lethal chamber" or public locally operated gas chambers.  in 1918, Popenoe, the Army venereal disease specialist during World War I, co-wrote the widely used textbook, Applied Eugenics, which argued, "From a historical point of view, the first method which presents itself is execution...  Its value in keeping up the standard of the race should not be underestimated."  Applied Eugenics also devoted a chapter to "Lethal Selection," which operated "through the destruction of the individual by some adverse feature of the environment, such as excessive cold, or bacteria, or by bodily deficiency."   

Eugenics breeders believed American society was not ready to implement an organized lethal solution.  But many mental institutions and doctors practiced improvised medical lethality and passive euthanasia on their own.  one institution in Lincoln, Illinois fed its incoming patients milk from tubercular cows believing a eugenically strong individual would be immune.  Thirty to forty percent annual death rates resulted at Lincoln.  Some doctors practiced passive eugenicide one on newborn infant at a time.  Other doctors at mental institutions engaged in lethal neglect.   

Nonetheless, with eugenicide marginalized, the main solution for eugenicsts was the rapid expansion of forced segregation and sterilization, as well as more marriage restrictions.  California led the nation, performing nearly all the sterilization procedures with little or no due process.  In its first twenty-five years of eugenics legislation, California sterilized 9/782 individuals, mostly women.  Many were classified as "bad girls," diagnosed as "passionate," "oversexed'" or "sexually wayward."  At Sonoma, some women were sterilized because of what was deemed an abnormally large clitoris or labia.  

In 1933 alone, at least 1,278 coercive sterilizations were performed, 700 of which were on women.  The state's two leading sterilization mills in 1933 were Sonoma State Home with 388 operations and Patton State Hospital with 363 operations.  Other sterilization centers included Agnews, Mendocino, Napa, Norwalk, Stockton and Pacific Colony state hospitals.

Even the United States Supreme Court endorsed aspects of eugenics.  In its infamous 1927 decision, Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote, "It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind...  Three generations of imbeciles are enough."  The decision opened the floodgates for thousands to be coercively sterilized or otherwise persecuted as subhuman.  Years later, the Nazis at the Nuremberg trials quoted Holmes's words in their own defense.  

Only after eugenics became entrenched in the United States was the campaign transplanted into Germany, in no small measure through the efforts of California eugenicists, who published booklets idealizing sterilization and circulated them to German officials and scientists. 

Hitler studied American eugenics laws.  he tried to legitimize his antisemitism by medicalizing it, and wrapping it in the more palatable pseudo scientific facade of eugenics.  Hitler was able to recruit more followers among reasonable Germans by claiming that science was on his side.  While Hitler's race hatred sprung from his own mind, the intellectual outlines of the eugenics Hitler adopted in 1924 were made in AMERICA. 

During the '20s, Carnegie Institution eugenic scientists cultivated deep personal and professional relationships with Germany's FASCIST eugenicists.  In Mein Kampf, published in 1924, Hitler quoted American eugenic ideology and openly displayed a thorough knowledge of American eugenics.  "There is today state," wrote Hitler, "in which at least weak beginnings toward a better conception (of immigration) are noticeable.  Of course, it is not our model German Republic, but the United States."

Hitler proudly told his comrades just how closely he followed the progress of the American eugenics movement.  "I have studied with great interest," he told fellow Nazi, "the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would, in all probability, be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock."

Hitler even wrote a fan letter to American eugenic leader Madison Gran calling his race-based eugenics book, "The Passing of the Great Race" his "bible."

Hitler's struggle for a superior race would be a made crusade for a Master Race.  Now, the American term "Nordic" was freely exchanged with "Germanic" or "Aryan.  Race science racial purity and racial dominance became the driving force behind Hitler's Nazism.  Nazi eugenics would ultimately dictate who would be persecuted in a Reich-dominated Europe, how people would live, and how they would DIE.  Nazi doctors would become the unseen generals in Hitler's war against the Jews and other Europeans deemed inferior.  Doctors would create the science, devise the eugenic formulas, and even hand-select the victims for sterilization, euthanasia and mass extermination.  (Weaponizing Health Workers: How Medical Professionals Were a Top Instrument in U.S. Torture Program Emails Show American Psychological Association Secretly Worked with Bush Admin to Enable Torture )

During the Reich's early years, eugenicists across America welcomed Hitler's plan as the logical fulfillment of their own decades of research and effort.  California eugenicists republished Nazi propaganda for American consumption.  They also arranged for Nazi scientific exhibits, such as an August 1934 display at the L.A. County Museum, for the annual meeting of the American Public Health Association.  

In 1934, as Germany's sterilizations were accelerating beyond 5.000 per month, the California eugenics leader C.M. Goethe upon returning from Germany ebulliently bragged to a key colleague, "You will be interested to know, that your work has played a powerful part in shaping the opinions of the group of intellectuals who are behind Hitler in this epoch-making program.  Everywhere I sensed that their opinions have been tremendously stimulated by American thought...I want you, dear friend, to carry this thought with you for the rest of your life, that you have really jolted into action a great government of 60 million people."

That same year, ten years after Virgina passed its sterilization act, Joseph DeJarnette, superintendent of Virginia's Western State Hospital, observed in the Richmond Times-Dispatch, "The Germans are beating us at our own game." 

More than just providing the scientific roadmap, American funded Germany's eugenic institutions.  By 1926, Rockefeller had donated some $410,000 --- almost $4 million in 21st Century money -- to hundreds of German researchers.  In May 1926, Rockefeller awarded $250,000 to the German Psychiatric Institute of Kaiser Wilhelm Institute, later to become the Kaiser Whilhelm Institute for Psychiatry.  Among the leading psychiatrists at the German Psychiatric Institute was Ernst Rudin, who became director and eventually an architect of Hitler's systematic medical repression.  

Another in the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute's eugenic complex of institutions was the Institute for Brain Research.  Since 1915, it had operated out of a single room.  Everything changed when Rockefeller money arrived in 1929.  A grant of $317,000 allowed the Institute to construct a major building and take center stage in German race biology.  The Institute received additional grants from the Rockefeller Foundation during the next several years.  Leading the Institute, once again, was Hitler's medical henchman Ernst Rudin.  Rudin's organization became prime director and recipient of the murderous experimentation and research conducted on Jews, Gypsies and others.  

Beginning in 1940, thousands of Germans taken from old age homes, mental institutions and other custodial facilities were systematically gassed.  Between 50,000 and 100,000 were eventually killed.  

Leon Whitney, executive secretary of the American Eugenics Society declared of Nazism, "While we were pussy-footing around...the Germans were calling a spade a spade."

A special recipient of Rockefeller funding was the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity, an Eugenics in Berlin.  For decades, American eugenicists had carved twins to advance their research into heredity.  The Institute was now prepared to undertake such research on an unprecedented level.  On May 13, 1932, the Rockefeller Foundation in New York dispatched a radiogram to its Paris office:  JUNE MEETING EXEUCTIVE COMMITTEE NINE THOUSAND DOLLARS OVER THREE YEAR PERIOD TO SWG INSTITUTE ANTHROPOLOGY FOR RESEARCH ON TWINS AN EFFECTS ON LATER GENERATIONS OF SUBSTANCES TOXIC FOR GERM PLASM.  

At the time of Rockefeller endowment, Otmar Freiherr von Verschuer, a hero in American Eugenics circles, functioned as a head of the Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics.   Rockefeller funding of that Institute continued both directly and through other research conduits during Verschuer's early tenure.  In 1935, Verschuer left the Institute to form a rival eugenics facility in Frankfurt that was much heralded in the American eugenic press.  Research on twins in the Third Reich exploded, backed by government decrees.  Verschuer wrote in Der Erbartz, a eugenic doctor's journal he edited, that Germany's war would yield a "total solution to the Jewish problem."

Verschuer had a long-time assistant.  His name was Josef Mengele.  On May 30, 1943, Mengele arrived at Auschwitz, Verschuer notified the German Research Society, "My assistant, Dr. Josef Mengele (M.D., Ph.D.) joined me in this branch of research.  He is presently employed as Hauptsturmfuhrere (captain) and camp physician in the Auschwitz concentration camp.  Anthropological testing of the most diverse racial groups in this concentration camp is being carried out with permission of the SS Reichsfuhrere (Himmler)."

Mengele began searching the boxcar arrivals for twins.  When he found them, he performed beastly experiments, scrupulously wrote up the reports and sent the paperwork back to Verschuer's institute for evaluation.  Often, cadavers, eyes and other body parts were also dispatched to Berlin's eugenic institutes.  

Rockefeller executives never knew of Mengele.  With few exceptions, the foundation had ceased all eugenics studies in Nazi-occupied Europe before the war erupted in 1939.  But by that time the dye had been cast.  The talented men Rockefeller and Carnegie financed, the institutions they helped found, and the science it helped create took on a scientific momentum of their own. (THIS IS INACCURATE INFORMATION - HUMAN EXPERIMENTS DID CONTINUE UNTIL THE END OF THE WAR)

After the war, eugenics was declared a crime against humanity--an act of genocide.  Germans were tried and they cited the California statutes in their defense.  To no avail.  They were found guilty.  

However, Mengele's boss Verschuer escaped prosecution.  Verschuer re-established his conncections with California eugenicists who had gone underground and renamed their crusade, "human genetics."  Typical was an exchange July 25, 1946 when Popenoe wrote Verschuer, "It was indeed a pleasure to hear from you again.  I have been very anxious about my colleagues in Germany... I suppose sterilization has been discontinued in Germany?"  Popenoe offered tidbits about various American eugenic luminaries and then sent various eugenic publications.  In a separate package, Popenoe sent some cocoa, coffee, and other goodies.  

Verschuer wrote back, "Your very friendly letter of 7/25 gave me great deal of pleasure and you have my heartfelt thanks for it.  The letter builds another bridge between your and my scientific work; I hope that this bridge will never again collapse but rather make possible valuable mutual enrichment and stimulation."

Soon, Verschuer once again became a respected scientist in Germany and around the world.  In 1949, he became a corresponding member of the newly formed American Society of Human Genetics, organized y American eugenicists and geneticists.  

In the fall of 1950, the University of Munster offered Verschuer a position at its new Institute Human Genetics, where he later became a dean.  In the early and mid-1950s, Verschuer became an honorary member of numerous prestigious societies, including the Italian Society of Genetics, the Anthropological Society of Vienna, and the Japanese Society of Human Genetics.  

Human genetics' genocidal roots in eugenics were ignored by victorious generations that refused to link itself to the crimes of Nazism and by succeeding generations that never knew the truth of the years leading up to the war.  Now governors of five states, including California have issued public apologies to their citizens, past and present, for sterilization and other abuses spawned y the eugenics movement.  

Human genetics became enlightened endeavor in the late twentieth century.  Hard-working, devoted scientists finally cracked the human code through the Human Genome Project.  Now, every individual can be biologically identified and classified by trait and ancestry.  Yet even now, some leading voices in the genetic world are calling for cleansing of the unwanted among us, and even a master human species.  

There is understandable wariness about more ordinary forms of abuse, for example, in denying insurance or employment based on genetic tests.  On October 14, America's first genetic anti-discrimination legislation passed the Senate y unanimous vote.  Yet because genetics research is global, no single nation's law can stop the threats. 



Tuesday, May 19, 2015


19 May 2015

ACOUSTIC CAMERAS - Visually Isolate and See where Acoustic Noise / Frequencies are coming from.  Not unlike the FLIR Infrared Camera's which will show visually any HOT Spots, the Acoustic Camera can show where there are what is known as SOUND LEAKS - 

For me, what this type of Capability will ultimately represent is to VISUALLY Isolate Near or Exact locations where portable Directed Energy Weapons EMITTER SYSTEMS are being set up and Blasted from - Thus providing Clear Documentation of Harassment for Legal Purposes. 

Visualizing sound -in a fast and precise way!

FOR TARGETED VICTIMS' this would provide a documented Visual of the Near or Exact Locations where Directed Energy Emitter Systems are being Fired From, but there is a slight problem
1. Costs are in the tens of thousands of dollars
2. Their Microphones do not yet have the capabilities of visually recording Infrasound or Extremely Low Frequencies - which many of the Directed Energy Systems run off of.

As such, I began sending out EMAIL's asking if they had portable / hand held products that covered various Frequency Ranges, which I wanted to Visually Record, and also to PinPoint near or exact locations of the emitter locations.  

I was able to contact Norsonic and Polytech, Inc and was able to speak with a U.S. Sales Representative from Polytech who was not absolutely sure if their Acoustic Camera's would be able to Visually Record or Show the Frequencies I was interested in, but would be in touch with the German manufactureres' to pose the questions to them. 

My questions were geared towards Extreme Low Frequencies (Infrasound), which is BELOW the HEARING THRESHOLD and Extreme High Frequencies (Ultrasound), which is ABOVE the Hearing Threashold in both cases, they claim NOT TO QUITE have Handheld capabilities to Visually Document and Isolate locations in those ranges, but they are CLOSE.

 I also provided them with the following information, so as to provide them WITH hopefully in the near future their Visual Acoustic Camera's may be able to RECORD -

Additional frequency ranges
Exposure capabilities from 100 kHz to 94 GHz

Additional following capabilities
Emitter Systems:
VHF, C-band, L-band, S-band, X-band, 35 and 94 GHz, ultra wideband,
circular waveguides, and 10 anechoic chambers.

I am hoping by providing them with the necessary information, their engineers can come up with a VISUAL ACOUSTIC CAMERA'S that have the NECESSARY FREQUENCY RANGES, which can PINPOINT and ISOLATE NEAR or EXACT LOCATIONS of where these MAN-PORTABLE  and or HANDHELD EMITTER SYSTEMS are being BLASTED FROM.

Norsonic stated they did not have the capabilities at present but provided me with a link to the following Acoustic Camera manufactureres in Switerzland who has come the closest to Visually Recording Ultrasonic Frequencies

Distran Ultra localizes sound sources totally passively from 3 kHz to 50 kHz. Lightweight, the camera can be hand-held thanks to its compact size (24cm x 24cm x 5cm). It is especially useful to track phenomena that produce ultrasounds such as gas leaks or sparks.

Here are some samples of VISUALLY seeing where NOISE is being Generated From -

Norsonic Acoustic Camera - Wind turbines

Noise survey investgation into source of low frequency noise

Norsonic Acoustic Camera - Engine noise test 


Monday, May 18, 2015

Weaponizing Health Care Professionals & their Criminal Complicity in TORTURE

18 May 2015

The following segments from, "Democracy Now" have provided a very clear example of what Targeted Individual's such as myself have been stating for year, which is Medical Professionals' have been actively involved with the criminal, illegal, non consensual human experiments that have been taking place, in particular with the advent of Cognitive Neuroscience, and the gizmos', gadgets', and sensors being developed to Detect brain activities, states of mind, cognition, manipulation of motor, central nervous system, and or behavioral functions.

What this outlines is WITHOUT Experts from within the Psychological and or Medical Profession, there more than likely would not have been the Office of Legal Memos, Outline WHAT CONSTITUTES TORTURE.

Without their Architecture - the Grunt Implementing the Torture Techniques would NOT KNOW how far they could go, or how many times was permissible, Without these Experts and Professionals within said fields, the Grunts would NOT have a Guidebook to Follow, Buttons to Push, or Knowledge of how Best to DO HARM.

Regardless, those individuals who are the so called GRUNTS are criminal responsible for their Active and or Aggressive Participation because of their cognizant abilities to determine Right from Wrong - therefore, in the end, the CONSPIRACY from the lowest levels (those who implement, cover up, sanction, etc what has been designed) to those who Architecturally Design the Tactics, Techniques, and How to Use the Weaponized Technologies, and Biological-Technologies - ALL ARE COMPLICIT in the CRIMES being committed upon and against Non Consensual Targeted Victims' who have come forward to ALL PROPER AUTHORITIES to INTERVENE, CONDUCT A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION, and Criminal Prosecution of any and all who have Targeted the Human Living Life of a Targeted Individual.

The Below Linked "DEMOCRACY NOW SEGMENTS" - Exposes how, in particular the Psychologist's i.e. Medical Professional used their Expertise to Architecturally Design the CIA Torture Program and most of all Provide LEGAL COVER by Re-Writing the ETHICAL CODES in terms of, DO NO HARM -

Weaponizing Health Workers: How Medical Professionals Were a Top Instrument in U.S. Torture Program

TO DRIVE THIS POINT HOME  - in terms of THE REALITY of Various Healthcare Professionals' and WOULD THEY "DO HARM" -

Lawyer: Doctor who gave wrong diagnoses has brain damage

Here is a recent article about a Neurologist / Medical Professional who was just charged with providing incorrect and deliberate MISDIAGNOSIS' to Patients, one of whom Committed Suicide.  
(This is in line with those within this field who would deliberately MisDiagnose an Individual's for 

1. Research i.e. provide a misdiagnosis in order to conduct Neurological Experiments on a HEALTHY BRAIN to Reverse Engineer the Mapping Pathways - of that Healthy Brain, while letting the Victim think they have some Disease or Diagnosis.

2. To either gain informed consent, or fradulent misrepresentation and omission of material facts while conducting various Neurological i.e. Neurotechnological Experiments - 

Now this Neurologist is claiming "He" is the one who has brain damage, and therefore, made ALL these Misdiagnosis' but whenever you come across something like this, and it pertains to Neurologists', Neuroscientists', et. al. you can bet the MISDIAGNOSIS of Patients/Victim's of said Misdiagnosis' were done for the purpose of advancing some Experimental Protocol - because YOU NEED HEALTHY BRAINS that can be REVERSE ENGINEERED TO MIMIC the Advances of some Neurological Disease, Disorder, Mental Incapacity - One Cannot Map something that is ALREADY DAMAGED - They need HEALTHY BRAINS - to MAP the PATHWAYS to the already Neurological Damaged Brain be it Alzheimer', Parkinson's', Traumatic Brain Injury, Autism,  etc., etc., etc. - the damage in these individual's is ALREADY DONE - 

ONLY HEALTHY, FUNCTIONAL BRAINS - THAT ARE DELIBERATELY REVERSED ENGINEERED - can provide the MOST SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS - and that is WHAT UNSUSPECTING Target's - and It would Appear DELIBERATE MISDIAGNOSIS' by said Professionals/Experts are doing - Taking the Healthy so that they can MAP via Reverse Engineering the Human Brain.

The following Links will Provide you WITH NAMES of Entities i.e. Academia, and Professionals who have KNOWLEDGE in one for or the other about WHAT THE FUCK is HAPPENING to TARGETED INDIVIDUAL'S - who have come forward and documented long before INFORMATION is coming out publicly about Research, Development, and Outcomes.

Long before the 2013 Presidential State of the Union Address Outlining the, "BRAIN PROJECT' - The world of ACADEMIA, LAW, SCIENCE, BIOTECHNOLOGY, PSYCHOLOGY, PHILOSOPHY, ET AL came together to begin the process of making COLLECTIVE DECISION about how the Advances in Cognitive Neuroscience and their subsequent Neurotechnologies i.e Biometric Detection/Sensor/Readers, Gizmos', Gadgets', Scanning's, Mapping, etc can be used for and in terms of The  LAW -

Original FACT SHEET 
ABOUT the Law & Neuroscience Project (2007)
(note the NUMBER of Universities (Academia) already involved at that time)
To Zoom In 
1. click on document
2. Right Click and Scroll to Open Image In Another Window - then you can zoom into the document

The Current Network Administration Guiding the Project - as you will read, a virtual whose, whom, in the world of Academia, Law, Science, Technology, and MEDICINE in particular Psychology -