I've been waiting for the below publication because I have spoken about it on several occasions on my show, and have documented in terms of at my time and analysis of the illegal neurological experiments transpiring that there were two protocols taking place.
MAPPING and TRACKING the COGNITIVE FUNCTIONS of the FOLLOWING BRAINS
VICTIM WHO RESPONDS TO ACTS OF AGGRESSION (Non Violent REACTIVE Aggression)
1. the Targeted Individuals Aggression/Anger in the "heat of the moment" i.e. screaming/yelling, acting out During or After some type of Organized Provocation takes place i.e. vandalism, petty theft, break/enter, constant electronic harassment, electronic warfare disruption, DDoS, interference, hacking, directed energy weapons blasting be they heat, acoustics, shocks, pulses, etc - to the extensive transcranial magnetic stimulations or magnetic pulses fired through the human skull to activate or deactivate various brain regions - These wold be considered IMMEDIATE or DURING SOMETHING that was committed, done, inflicted by an EXTERNAL SOURCE - generally to DELIBERATELY PROVOKE a Negative Response -
INDIVIDUALS and or GROUPS WHO INFICT OR COMMIT ACTS OF AGGRESSION (INSTRUMENTAL Aggression)
2. the recruited Civilian Perpetrator Communities for their deliberate/cognizant active involvement, and or direct participation in committing acts of Instrumental Aggression upon and against the Targeted Individual who resides within that Community i.e. community harassment, stalking, mobbing, vehicle stalking & crowding, job mobbing/harassment, group harassment, torturing via criminal access to directed energy Anti-Personnel Less Lethals, Biological-Technological Weapons in the form of Wireless Neurotechs, etc.
And the DIFFERENCE IN BRAIN FUNCTION I.E. SYNAPTIC FIRING and can BIOMETRIC SENSORS BE BUILT to DISTINGUISH THESE DIFFERENCES.
A Target may scream out in pain, frustration, and hate DURING THE MOMENTS they are being victimized by some event that is deliberately inflicted by the Recruited Perps, and their negative responses to such organized violence, mob mentality and extra judicial targeting.
Whereas the recruited Perp Communities, will gather, plot, plan, and with premeditated, malicious intent, seek ways in which to STRIKE OUT, INFLICT and COMMIT various Crimes upon and against the Targeted Victim.
Two types of Aggressive behavior - ONE BIOMETRIC SYSTEM to DETECT MALICIOUS INTENT via Next, Next Generation Biometrics i.e Optical, Facial, Emotion and Vocal to BRAIN Recognition - and to Prove in a Court that the Behavioral Software has the Capacity to DISTINGUISH and DIFFERENTIATE the difference between a Victim/Provoked Aggression and a Potential Perpetrator of some Crime /Premeditated Malicious Intent Aggression.
I term this the "SMEAR, FEAR, HATE, RETALIATION, REVENGE Campaign and Once the Perps have been Sufficiently Radicalized will in fact strike out at the Target: WITHOUT QUESTION, WITHOUT RESERVATION, WITHOUT REMORSE and MOST OF ALL WITHOUT REGARD to the HUMAN LIFE and or HUMANITY of the TARGETED INDIVIDUAL -"
I have used this example: A woman gets a call from work that something has happened to one of her parents - She leaves work, and must get to the airport to catch a flight to say her last good-byes to an ill parent in another state. She comes home from work unannounced and finds her husband in bed with another woman. (She is feeling all sorts of NEGATIVE EMOTIONS - hate, wanting to castrate her husband, wanting to harm the female in their bed with her husband, etc... violence/aggression) but does not have time to deal with this because she HAS to Catch a flight - on her way to the airport, there is traffic, which is making her late with the possibility of missing the flight (agitated, anxious, etc emotions) At this stage her BRAIN is firing in all sorts of different NEGATIVE WAYS -
This particular Airport has Biometric Malicious Intent Sensors and Tracks people walking through the airport who may have Malicious Intent - HOW CAN THESE BIOMETRIC SYSTEMS DETECT MALICIOUS INTENT and KNOW the ABOVE EMOTIONS of the Victim of witnessing her husbands infidelity, her anxiety she may not make her flight to say her last good-byes to her parent, her agitation at possibly being late, her anger at the entire situation, are not just CIRCUMSTANCE of something immediate as opposed to someone with true malicious intent to harm others is walking through that same airport?
If, these Biometric Malicious Intent Sensors Systems CANNOT Distinguish the two, then the system is FLAWED. And, even more importantly having NEGATIVE THOUGHTS not based on Premeditated Malicious Intent, but due to a variety of negative circumstance in the immediate aftermath and those negative thoughts based upon those circumstances.
Thus, these MALIANT DETECTION SYSTEMS must also be able to distinguish True PROVOCATION / Reaction and SUBJECTIVE PROVOCATION /Infliction of Violence -
THERE IS A LITERAL INVISIBLE FINE LINE BETWEEN NEGATIVE THOUGHTS and MALICIOUS ACTIONS -
Target may have negative thoughts due to being the victims of aggressive, organized criminal behavior being inflicted (THOUGHTS)
The Perp Communities negative thoughts about any given Target causes them to CROSS that line from Negative THOUGHTS to Negative ACTS and ACTIONS against the Targeted Victim (NEGATIVE ACTIONS)
The following published study now goes into some detail about using Neuroscience and Neurotechnologies to better distinguish between how these Two Different types of Aggression and can be distinguished through brain mapping which they are terming : "REACTIVE" aggression (Targeted Individual's) and "INSTRUMENTAL" that of the Entire Recruited Perpetrator Communities..
A key distinction for research on aggression is between “reactive” and “instrumental” subtypes (Berkowitz, 1989). Reactive aggression is an impulsive, anger-laden response, immediately following some type of provocation (e.g., a bar fight triggered by an insult). By contrast, instrumental aggression is pre-meditated and goal-oriented (e.g., battering a potential witness to intimidate them into withholding testimony).
Different mental disorders are associated with increased risk for each type of aggression. Post- traumatic stress disorder and schizophrenia, for example, are associated with increased risk for reactive aggression (Vitiello et al., 1990, Sullivan and Elbogen, 2013). Notably, psychopathy is the only disorder known to confer increased risk for both reactive and instrumental aggression (Cornell et al., 1996). Given that reactive and instrumental aggression can be differentially affected in mental health disorders, it makes sense that somewhat separable neural systems subserve these behaviors (see White, Meffert & Blair, Science in the Courtroom Vol. 1, No. 1).
Though this report "CLAIMS" to only have conducted Experiments on Rodents', Target's like myself KNOW that they are using American Soil as a Huge Laboratory and Social Experiment - but more importantly the Recruited Perpetrator Communities are the COMPUTATIONAL DATA that will BUILD NATIONWIDE MALICIOUS INTENT BEHAVIORAL DETECTION SENSORS - as their NEUROLOGICAL OUTPUT is far more in line with DETECTING ACTS and ACTIONS with Malicious Intent because THEY ... not the Targeted Victim/s have literally crossed the line from their Negative Thoughts about a Target, right into Active Negative Acts and Actions upon and against that Targeted Victim.
In addition, Target's DO NOT suffer from Schizophrenia or Paranoid Delusions, they SUFFER from Deliberate and Repeated infliction of Premeditated Aggressive Violence, and Traumatic Experiences to cause the greatest levels of continued Traumatic Stress.
I have proven the neuro-scientists theories are FLAWED by way of providing a salient example about the "WOMAN TAKING A FLIGHT" - she is neither Schizophrenic, Paranoid or suffering from Post Traumatic Stress - She has been Traumatized, yes... by the immediate experiences, but is not the WHO reacts more to various Aggressive Thoughts and Behaviors.
As such the Targeted Individual/Victim may suffer from Traumatic Stress and Post Traumatic Stress from constant Blitzing sustained on a daily basis as a myriad of premeditated protocols, tactics, techniques, weaponized technologies, anti-personnel directed energy weapons, weaponized technologies, bio-technologies and neurotechnologies are indiscriminately inflicted upon and against the Target with premeditated, malicious intent for the purpose of PROVOKING a Target into negatively reacting to such Violence.
WHAT THEY HAVE BEEN DOING TO TARGET'S:
From the Snowden Leaks - JTRIG Ops 1. Blitz a Target 2. Take PARANOIA to a Whole New Leavel
HERE IS THE REALITY, which I have REPEATED on Numerous Occassion's:
IF, you want to study TERRORISM, ORGANIZED TERRORISM, TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES, and ACTIVITIES, not to mention RADICALIZED EXTREMISM, HUBRIS, WITHOUT REMORSE, ABILITY TO DISTINGUISH RIGHT from WRONG - a Targeted Individual cannot provide the computational data necessary because they are the VICTIMS of Terrorism -
WHERE the researchers will find the MOST computational data will be via THEMSELVES, along with the recruited Perp communities because THEY alone exhibit the most data in terms of Malicious Intent, Malicious Acts, Dark Triad Pathologies, etc. And, I would include MOST ALL those CONDUCTING the EXPERIMENTS because their belief that AMERICAN SOIL is their LABORATORY to conduct such Human Experiments - PROVES above and beyond the Recruited Perpetrator Communities, they as the Experts, Professionals, etc suffer the most in terms of negative pathologies and beliefs.
Narrative Networks
:
excerpt:
2. Psychopathy and instrumental aggression
A unique feature of psychopathy is that it is associated with an increased risk for instrumental aggression (Blair, 2007b ).lnstrumental aggression, also referred to as proactive or predatory aggression, is controlled, purposeful, and used to achieve a desired external goal
Several studies have demonstrated that psychopathic criminals are
more likely to engage in predatory violence, while non-psychopathic
violent criminals are more likely to engage in reactive violence
(Meloy, 1988, 1995; Serin, 1991; Williamson, Hare, & Wong, 1987).
This is especially true for what are typically considered more serious
types of offenses, such as serious sexual assault or homicide. Less
serious offenses, such as theft or burglary, are likely to be committed
at similar rates by non-psychopathic individuals. Williamson et al.
(1987) examined characteristics of violent offenses and found that
psychopathic offenders were much.more motivated by material gain
or revenge (45.2% of violent acts) than non-psychopathic offenders
A unique feature of psychopathy is that it is associated with an increased risk for instrumental aggression (Blair, 2007b ).lnstrumental aggression, also referred to as proactive or predatory aggression, is controlled, purposeful, and used to achieve a desired external goal
(e.g., to obtain money or drugs). Injury to others is typically secondary
to the acquisition of some other goal. Instrumental aggression tends to
be premeditated and is not preceded by a strong emotional reaction.
In other disorders such as schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, increases
in aggression tend to be relatively more reactive in nature. Reactive
aggression is impulsive and emotion-driven acts in response to threat
or provocation (e.g.. in the context of a heated argument) (Meloy,
1988, 1997). The classification of individuals or acts as reactively and
instrumentally aggressive is not mutually exclusive - individuals may
engage in both types of aggression, and singular acts may contain
elements of both types of aggression. Psychopathic individuals
demonstrate reactive aggression in addition to instrumental aggres-
sion (Flight & Forth, 2007; Hare, 2003; Reidy, Zeichner, Miller, &
Martinez, 2007); however, it is their proneness to instrumental
aggression that may distinguish them from other antisocial indivi-
duals, and may have the most serious implications.
(14.6% of violent acts). Furthermore, psychopaths were less likely to
have experienced emotional arousal during their crimes than non-
psychopaths (2.4% compared to 31.7%of violent acts). Woodworth &
Porter (2002) found that psychopathic individuals were about
twice as likely to have committed primarily instrumental homicides
as non-psychopathic offenders. In fact, 93.3%of homicides committed
by psychopathic offenders were instrumental in nature, compared with
48%of those by non-psychopathic offenders; again, psychopaths were
found to rarely commit violent crimes under intense emotional arousal.
Cornell et al. (1996) found that offenders who had committed at least
one act of instrumental violence were more psychopathic, specifically
with respect to pathological lying, manipulativeness, superficiality, lack
of empathy, exhibiting a parasitic lifestyle, irresponsibility, and criminal
versatility. In addition, instrumental offenders demonstrated more
violent criminal behavior. A higher proportion of spousal abusers
who were classified as instrumentally aggressive were found to be
psychopathic compared to spousal abusers classified as being reactively
aggressive (Chase. O'Leary,& Keyman, 2001). Based on these studies. it
appears that violent aggression committed by psychopathic individuals
is more likely to be instrumental in nature.
No comments:
Post a Comment