Saturday, August 18, 2018

EDD Appeal In OC (6) Hours South of Residence & Former Place of Employment - WHY? OBSTRUCTION?

18 August 2018 - To not only show the Patter of Obstruction of Justice, and Conspiracy Against Rights - but also to show they will send a Victim to a location already known to have insiders who have colluded, conspired, and corrupted the entire system of justice.  In my case an appeal hearing approximately (6) hours from my residence and from the location of my former employers. 

For True Justice to begin asking:

1. Why Orange County?

2. Looks like a Conspiracy Against Rights

3. Why send Me to an Orange County Court System - that is now being proven to have Conspired to Obstruct Justice, Use Informants, Tape Phone Conversations in order to gain 'insider' information, utilize insider information gleaned through Attorney/Client privilege and or in my case as a Targeted Victim, warrant-less wiretapping, and or having my conversations taped by an Informant/Snitch for the purpose of setting people up via Informants, to Entrap people

4. Why would I be sent to such a jurisdiction, unless the Conspiracy and Collusion was with premeditated, malicious intent and design to send me to a court system that would further obstruct justice and attempt to criminalize me the VICTIM, as opposed to those in positions of authority and or power who have totally destroyed any resemblance of fair, unbiased, and the so called balanced scales of justice.

5. Who instructed the Employment Development Department of move my Appeals to a location they knew I would not attend in person due to the six plus hours it would take me to show up? But where my former Employers have retained a Law Firm, from which I am sure they would not have a problem having their attorney's show up?

6. RETALIATION - for coming forward as a Targeted Victim - under 18 USC 1513: Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant - whereby, I am documented to include the latest with the California State Attorney General's Office about cyber, talking, vandalism, carrying the Marcy's Victims' Bill of Rights and other harassment claims via Community based terrorism, et.al. 

 Whoever knowingly, with the intent to retaliate, takes any action harmful to any person, including interference with the lawful employment or livelihood of any person, for providing to a law enforcement officer any truthful information relating to the commission or possible commission of any Federal offense, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.

 This is what is transpiring in terms of my working reputation being blacklisted by members of this State Sponsored Domestic Terrorist Organization, by way of libel and slander to obstruct me financially - and for this change in Venue to Southern California - these are all LINKED


7. The final and MOST SIGNIFICANT portion of this investigation - IF, the Sheriff's, Jails, District Attorney's Office, and possible the Courts and Judges have colluded, in Criminal Justice, what is to say within the jurisdiction of Orange County, Discrimination Cases and or Appeals, Wrongful Terminations, Unemployment Benefit Denials, and a host of OTHER venues in which the Justice System, has FAILED these individual's as well?  If the nature of what is coming out is about the corruption of the criminal justice system in Orange County, what makes any of these other judicial and or appellates any different?  If it can be compromised to this degree, it can be compromised thoroughout the entire system, and my VENUE being set up in Orange County - is proof of how the ENTIRE SYSTEM is being corrupted and a full blown conspiracy against rights takes place.

I have an appeal with the Administrative Law Judge for my denial of Unemployment Benefits based on what my former Employers stated, which could have easily been refuted, when I was being interviewed and told the interviewer that I had documents to show what was stated by the company was based on lies, and what I had as documented back up to show what I was actually doing, and why, this was totally dismissed, as if the interviewer did not want to hear anything I had to say and or what I could provide.  The documentation was sent registered to them upon filing my appeal for benefits, along with the links which I have also documented were sent not publicly but to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for Cyber Crimes in the Workplace, and to Adobe to show what their Software Adobe PDF Reader was doing. 

The reason, Orange County is relevant is because of my Unemployment insurance being denied based on the lies told by my former Employers, who were the one's utilizing my Company User Profile to cyber harass me in the workplace, and they were caught visually on how it was being done.

I live on the Monterey Peninsula, which is in Northern California and a (6) plus HOUR drive by car to Southern California i.e. Orange County, California basically - but I live in Northern California, (1) hour by car to San Jose, CA, (1.5) hours by car to Oakland, CA and even approximately (3) hours to Sacramento where the State Capital is, yet for my Unemployment Appeal Hearing - I am being told to 'phone' in because it is KNOWN that it is not financially feasible to drive (6) hours down to Orange County, when they could have found a MUCH CLOSER location for my Unemployment Benefit Appeal hearing.

By contesting, it would simply DELAY my ability to a fair hearing, some additional three or more months, to the already almost four months I have been without Unemployment Benefits. 

We all know there was an Administrative Law Judge for my Unemployment Benefits much closer to home, yet they chose one of the most corrupted judicial systems in U.S. History to send my Unemployment Appeal to. 




 This is to document the VENUE which is in Southern California, and how as a Targeted Individual, Obstruction of Justice, Orchestrated Conspiracy Against Rights, and Deprivation of Rights, is taking place, and how 'they' will seek to conspire to make it as difficult, in particular, financially difficult for me to and other Targeted victim's to obtain an adjudication for the premeditated, malicious wrongs that have been committed.

This poses a grave concern since the following is known through mainstream media about the corruption, conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and a myriad of other federal offenses the Orange County Judicial system may have caused due to this type of 'INSIDER INFORMATION' criminality.

And, why would my Unemployment Appeals hearing be MOVED to Orange County, where it would be known I would not be able to show up in person, but where my former Employers have hired a Law Firm, which would make it easier for THEM to show up in court.

In addition to the below articles, in which it would appear they are attempting to utilize this incident as a means to try to criminally charge me, but ORANGE County, has shown with this latest in a long list of judicial malfeasance to be the worst place to seek justice without what transpires being fully compromised and or corrupted.

Yet what is being laid out in this pervasive criminal probe of the Orange County Sheriffs and Judicial Courts, only shows WHY my Unemployment Appeal case was moved from some location closer to home in Northern California, like I said even Sacramento where the state capital is, would have been a closer drive, than Orange County.

This is to document HOW BEING TARGETED and OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE through FELONIOUS MEANS at the STATE LEVEL will attempt to CRIMINALIZE the INNOCENT, while utilize these type of corrupted systems, in order to provide ADDITIONAL COVER to the CRIMINAL ACTS and ACTIONS by those in positions of power, who are the ACTUAL CRIMINALS 


Confidential Inmate Calls With Lawyers Recorded Illegally In California Jail For Years

The Orange County Sheriff’s Department illegally recorded more than 1,000 confidential calls between inmates and their attorneys since at least 2015 ― a violation of attorney-client privilege, considered to be one of the most sacred aspects of criminal law — a department employee revealed in court testimony this week. 

The revelation adds to the turmoil in a county that has for years been roiled by a scandal linked to the illegal use of jail informants by the sheriff’s department and district attorney’s office. That matter, which includes the use of illicit recordings of inmates by law enforcement, is believed to be the largest informant scandal in U.S. history. 

...  

The Orange County Sheriff’s Department illegally recorded more than 1,000 confidential calls between inmates and their attorneys since at least 2015 ― a violation of attorney-client privilege, considered to be one of the most sacred aspects of criminal law — a department employee revealed in court testimony this week. 
 
The revelation adds to the turmoil in a county that has for years been roiled by a scandal linked to the illegal use of jail informants by the sheriff’s department and district attorney’s office. That matter, which includes the use of illicit recordings of inmates by law enforcement, is believed to be the largest informant scandal in U.S. history

“The law has been clear for decades that calls between prisoners and their lawyers are confidential and may not be listened to or recorded. But this kind of unlawful eavesdropping occurs with alarming frequency,” said David C. Fathi, the director of the American Civil Liberty Union’s National Prison Project. “Whether it’s inadvertent or intentional, prisons and jails need to have robust protections in place to ensure that this kind of snooping doesn’t happen.”

A county already in crisis plunges deeper


The illegal recordings add to the criminal justice crisis that has plagued the county for years. The recordings raise further doubts about the purported yearslong probes by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra and U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions in the county. Both have said they are overseeing investigations into the Orange County District Attorney’s Office and the Orange County Sheriff’s Department over their roles in the jailhouse snitch scheme. The fact that the illegal recordings were made for many years ― during which the state and federal governments said they were investigating county agencies plagued by a lack of disclosure of evidence ― raises unsettling questions about the investigations.

ACLU Accuses Sheriff, Top Prosecutor Of Rampant Misconduct In California’s Orange County

LOS ANGELES ― A civil rights group has accused Orange County Sheriff Sandra Hutchens and District Attorney Tony Rackauckas of running a longstanding, secret and illegal jail informant program that has violated the rights of countless defendants for over 30 years, according to a bombshell lawsuit filed Wednesday.

The complaint, filed in Orange County Superior Court by the American Civil Liberties Union along with the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, bolsters the allegations of Assistant Public Defender Scott Sanders that the county was running an expansive jailhouse informant program. The corruption scandal has rocked the county’s criminal justice system for more than four years and has led to the unraveling of nearly 20 high-profile cases and threatens to upend still more.

The ACLU claims that the Orange County Sheriff’s Department and Orange County district attorney’s office have colluded to plant a large number of informants in jail cells for decades in order to obtain damning information from defendants who are charged with crimes and are awaiting trial. Such interrogations can give prosecutors an unfair advantage, by giving them access to information without the knowledge of the inmate’s lawyer. The Sixth Amendment prohibits the use of government-directed informants to question defendants who have already been charged with crimes.

The suit says that jail informants frequently obtained information and confessions from defendants through threats of violence, including murder, and that they were rewarded for their unlawful work by the district attorney’s office and the sheriff’s department with payments and sentence reductions. In court, prosecutors illegally withheld how and why their informants gleaned the damning information, despite being required by law to disclose this information to defendants and their representatives, according to the lawsuit.

“By running this massive, underground jailhouse informant scheme, the district attorney’s office and the sheriff’s department are cheating Orange County out of justice,” Brendan Hamme, staff attorney at the ACLU of Southern California, said in a statement. “They have won countless convictions based on unreliable information — the results of jailhouse informants’ coercion of defendants — that they passed off in court as solid, sound, and legal. Hiding the facts of the coercion from the defense is just one of the many ways they broke the law and endangered justice.”

 

 




No comments:

Post a Comment