FOR LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT (LAPD) INTERNAL AFFAIRS and INSPECTOR GENERALS OFFICE - also MAYOR GARCETTI'S OFFICE - for FURTHER INVESTIGATION INTO LAPD'S ROLE in this CRIMINAL AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT and RESIDENTIAL and COMMUNITY STREET TERRORISM:
The Resident's and Property Owner WANT TO CALL ME A LUNATIC, CRAZY, MENTAL CASE - Then UNDERSTAND they CANNOT DO THIS LEGALLY - and have in POINT OF FACT VIOLATED MY CIVIL RIGHTS -
From the Property Owner, the Resident's or the Recruited Los Angeles, CA Community believes they can Conspire to Commit, and/or Corroborate their Negative Narratives by calling me or slandering me with a LABEL - be it based on their Perceptions, what they were Told, or because they are using it as an Excuse / Cover in the hopes NO ONE WILL BELIEVE what I have to SAY...
Therefore - based on their Real, Perceived, or Utilization of Slander/Libel Labeling for Character and Credibility Assassination - via the "CRAZY" "LUNATIC" "MENTAL CASE"
THE FOLLOWING LAWS NOW APPLY IN THE FEDERAL and CIVIL CASE AGAINST ALL -
- Section 241 of Title 18 is the civil rights conspiracy
statute. Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons
to agree together to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in
any state, territory or district in the free exercise or
enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the
Constitution or the laws of the Unites States, (or because of
his/her having exercised the same). Unlike most conspiracy
statutes, Section 241 does not require that one of the
conspirators commit an overt act prior to the conspiracy becoming
The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.
- If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any
person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise
or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of
the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same;...
They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) prohibits discrimination and ensures equal opportunity for persons with disabilities in employment, State and local government services, public accommodations, commercial facilities, and transportation. It also mandates the establishment of TDD/telephone relay services. The current text of the ADA includes changes made by the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (P.L. 110-325), which became effective on January 1, 2009. The ADA was originally enacted in public law format and later rearranged and published in the United States Code.
THE OTHER LAWS - BE THEY CALIFORNIA OR FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS LAWS -
UNRUH CIVIL RIGHTS ACT
"All persons within the jurisdiction of this state are free and equal, and no matter what their sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, or sexual orientation are entitled to the full and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities, privileges, or services in all business establishments of every kind whatsoever."
THE BANE ACT
"The Bane Act," Civil Code section 52.1 --provides protection from interference by threats, intimidation, or coercion or for attempts to interfere with someone's state or federal statutory or constitutional rights (these include association, assembly, due process, education, employment, equal protection, expression, formation and enforcement of contracts, holding of public office, housing, privacy, speech, travel, use of public facilities, voting, worship, and protection from bodily restraint or harm, from personal insult, from defamation, and from injury to personal relations)
THE RALPH ACT
The Ralph Act," Civil Code sections 51.7 and 52--provides that it is a civil right for a person to be free of violence or its threat against the person or his or her property, because of a person's race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, political affiliation, sex, sexual orientation, age or disability or position in a labor dispute, or because a person is perceived to have one or more of these characteristics--(bases of discrimination are illustrative, rather than restrictive)
BASED ON ANONYMOUS SLANDEROUS REMARKS BY ANONYMOUS RESIDENT'S (Angel, who has done this before, which is a direct violation of my Civil Rights to Equal Protection) - INSTANT PERCEPTIONS ARE FORMED - AND SYSTEMATIC DEPRIVATION OR EQUAL RIGHTS, EQUAL PROTECTION, EQUAL ACCOMMODATIONS TRANSPIRE -
BASED ON THIS SAME 'PERCEPTION' OR "LABEL" is USED - Those Individual's Involved believe that Whatever the Victim has to say can be MINIMIZED, BRUSHED OFF, NOT TAKEN SERIOUSLY, DISREGARDED - and thus the Violence against that person, can continue -
What I realize is that ACTUALLY, NO IT CAN'T - and here is the reason why...
If, Anyone walked up to an Officer of the Law and that person was going on about how that Asian, Black, Latino, et al was a Troublemaker in some predominantly Caucasian neighborhood, or said that Lesbian, Gay, Transgender, et al is a Troublemaker, that Immigrants, that single mother or person from some other country is THE Troublemaker -
It is INSTANTLY RECOGNIZED as being Bigotry, Intolerant, Racists, etc. and thus the Officer generally and immediately Stops that person from continuing, knowing that the individual will be biased in their View Points and Maybe the Victim is not the Actual Troublemaker, but the Person who is espousing such bigoted labels.
The same regard is NOT being afforded a Person WHO IS being LABELED with "Disability in particular Mental Disabilities be they Perceived or Real -
And, instead of Affording that individual the Same, Exact, Equal Rights, Equal Protection, Dignity and Respect - it is utilized as a WEAPON - to Deny and Deprive that, minimize, disregard that individual of their Basic Fundamental Rights and Liberties -
In my case, a PERCEPTION used as a WEAPON - and EXCUSE
1. As an Excuse to Commit Aggravated Harassment, Stalking, Hate Crimes, Hostile Living, being Perpatrated upon and against my Person and Property by fellow Residents and Property Owner because they Want me out of the Building.
2. To Excuse or Cover Up what they are doing, by having two or more of them Corroborate their stories - hence Conspiracy to Commit/Cover Up - believing if they Utilize the Label, who is going to believe what the Victim has to say....
3. That by having to Conspire and Corroborate their Narrative and Stories - they can then Utilize the LABEL to Get Away with Whatever they are doing - thus allowing for these incidents to become more frequent, pervasive, aggressive, and at time violent.
ALL BASED ON A PREMEDITATED OBJECTIVE - DRIVE ME OUT OF THE BUILDING - Either by Constant Harassment or by Getting me in Trouble -
HERE IS THE PROBLEM with UTILIZING THE 'MENTAL/CRAZY CARD" - That is also a FULLY PROTECTED CLASS OF PERSON - and ANY DEPRIVATIONS OF RIGHTS, EQUAL ACCESS, EQUAL ACCOMMODATIONS, EQUAL PROTECTIONS - cannot be Denied or Deprived of that Individual - even if it is a Perception or being used as a Weapon to Excuse criminal Street Terrorism against the Targeted Victim.
Disability Rights in Housing
10:49 AM PDT
LAPD Olympic Station
Cannot Help, Dial 311 to ask for Civil Stand By
10:55 AM PDT
311 - City Hall
Cannot Help, Private Property, Talk to Property Owner, are there any Posted Signs, therefore, cannot do anything Up to Property Owner to Ensure parking is not obstructed.
I finally stated this is HOLDING MY VEHICLE and PROPERTY HOSTAGE to the WHIMS of the PROPERTY OWNER and RESIDENTS - but I also stated specifically that This was Residential Harassment because the Property Owner and Resident's want me OUT OF THE BUILDING and have been aggressively Harassing me.
At which point, ROY transferred me back to Police.
11:21 AM PDT - after being placed on Perpetual Hold, I hung up and dialed directly back to the Olympic Station
LAPD Olympic Station
McGee appeared to already be privy to what transpired with my conversation to Roy from City Hall, and once I stated My Property is being HELD / Impeded / Obstructed to the Whims of the Property Owner and Residents who want me OUT of the BUILDING - That it was akin to holding it HOSTAGE - and that I now wanted to file Criminal Charges against the Property Owner and Resident in question for Failure to Comply and Denying -
I was placed into Dispatch to send over LAPD -
THE CIVIL STANDBY - NEVER OCCURRED - but WAS ACTUALLY THE MOST RELEVANT OPTION - Which was to have them present, and have the resident blocking my vehicle to MOVE - so there was NO INCIDENT - AT NO TIME was this OPTION FORTHCOMING -
11:30 AM PDT
Two LAPD Officers Arrive at location
Officer Cardoza (younger officer with dark hair) - 37424
Officer Ordonez (older, bald ) - 36647
1. Resident Angel was speaking to the Officers as I was coming out to talk to them
a. SOP for Anomymous Residents to come out and Immediately get to or speak with LAPD before or when I am out of sight to Utilize Power of Suggestion Associated with Power of Association - Thus NEGATIVE COMMENTING by Angel, who has already done this with LAPD on the night Michael H. physically shoved me out of the door.
Video and Audio Running - attempting to explain the situation, but could see instantly that due to Resident Angel's, speaking to the Officer's - Everything was already 'COMPROMISED' -
Video explains what is transpiring and how the Property Owner, along with other Residents Want Me OUT of the Building are seek ways such as what I was showing them to Obstruct/Impede my ability to move my vehicle - WITHOUT ANY IMPEDING.
1. Told them that the Property Owner had already told this Resident NOT to Park his vehicle
2. That this Tenant Refuses to Comply with the Request
3. That this appears to be Orchestrated in the hopes of making my living situation as Extremely Difficult and Harassing - because THEY WANT ME OUT of this BUILDING
4. That My Property was / is being HELD to the WHIMS of the Property Owner and other Resident's who want me OUT of this BUILDING - by way of ENSURING that I CANNOT MOVE my vehicle safely.
5. Challenged both Officers to see if they COULD GET the VEHICLE OUT - both did not take the challenge
6. Officer Ordonez was immediately and highly HOSTILE towards me - with his Preconceived Perception of WHO I AM - as opposed to looking at the situation from a VICTIM asking for their Assistance.
In the Video you will see just how hostile this officer is towards me, and that the other officer was much more Civil and less judgmental. Told that the Situation is for the Property Owner, who is NOW REFUSING TO COMPLY with BASIC EQUAL ACCESS by way of Refusing to Ensure that ALL TENANTS to INCLUDE MYSELF are NOT INFRINGING -
Told by Officer Cardoza (younger officer with dark hair) - 37424 the nicer Peace Officer to contact the Property Owner, and tell her to Change my parking spot -
Officer Ordonez (older, bald ) - 36647 Should be investigated by Internal Affairs to find out why he is SO HOSTILE to a Civilian, because an Anonymous Resident (Angel) can come out prior to my speaking with them and Slander me quietly to them - Thus, altering and poisoning the waters for me to Provide them with the Details, without being treated with such contempt and hostility.
(This officer also appeared to be VIDEO TAPING the INCIDENT, so that video should show what was said prior to my coming out to speak with them by this RESIDENT ANGEL - if anything slanderous was stated this Tenant becomes Libel for Violation of My Civil Rights based on a Perception of Bigotry against a Protected Class of Person
11:42 AM - Did as Law Enforcement Requested Telephoned
Property Owner, Song Cha Choe - who did not answer phone -
left voice message, about her telling this resident NOT to PARK in Space -
13:52 PM PDT - Property Owner, Song Cha Choe Finally calls back -
Told her She told resident NOT to park vehicle, he continues to park, then disconnect the call.
(Thus acting on When or If, they SO CHOOSE to Deal with a Residential Situation that was supposed to have been resolved when the Property Owner, Song Cha Choe, along with her Son, Told this Resident NOT TO PARK his vehicle on the lot)
THIS IS PORTION - not the ATTORNEY I SPOKE TO - but the ENTIRE LAWYER REFERRAL NEEDS TO BE INVESTIGATED AND PRESENTED TO THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION - UPON UTILIZING LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICES - AND THE INABILITY TO OBTAIN LEGAL COUNCIL -
Telephoned the Attorney Referred to me by the Los Angeles County Bar Association - who is a Federal and Civil Litigator - but needed me to take care of the Immediate HOUSING Hostilities - that continue to Transpire -
Angelica - explained that the referal I was provided told me to first obtain a Housing/Tenant Lawyer to take care of the Immediate Hostilities -
Marabel - called back - stating she does not think ere are any Landlord / Tenant Attorneys - maybe I have to travel to Pasadena -